Extension Granted in Smith v. May Case

description

Case Summary

An extension of time to file an answer has been granted in the case of Smith No. 100 v. May, Sr. et al. The case, docketed as 26-cv-30029 in the District of Massachusetts, is a civil action. This filing indicates a procedural adjustment to the litigation timeline.

No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.

Key Issues

• • Extension of Time
• • Answer Filing

smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.

fact_check

Docket Snapshot

account_balance

Court

D. Mass.

District of Massachusetts · 1st Circuit · MA

tag

Docket

Not captured

Civil

timeline

Stage

Active litigation

Active

event

Filed

Date unavailable

Not in the available feed

new_releases

Latest Filing

3:26-cv-30029 Smith No. 100 v. May, Sr. et al

Other · May 08, 2026

newspaper

Coverage

1 article

1 source tracked

groups

Participants

Parties not parsed yet

2 linked entities

gavel

Judge

Not assigned in feed

What the record shows

This case is tied to District of Massachusetts, a federal district court in MA.

The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 08, 2026.

Party extraction has not produced a reliable plaintiff/defendant graph yet, so no speculative names are shown.

Press monitoring has found 1 related article from 1 distinct source.

chronic

The Story So Far

Updated 1 day, 1 hour ago

Smith No. 100 v. May, Sr. et al is an active civil matter in District of Massachusetts under docket 26-cv-30029.

Juryvine classifies the matter around civil litigation, federal courts.

The available docket gives enough signal to track the case, but not enough to overstate the merits. This page will become more useful as filings, orders, hearings, and party appearances add detail.

On May 8, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The court granted an extension of time for the defendants, May, Sr. et al, to file their answer in the Smith No. et al case.

The extension was granted for 15 days. This means the defendants now have more time to respond to the plaintiff's.

The next thing to watch is whether the latest other produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.

smart_toy Juryvine case narrative generated from the full docket timeline. How we verify our work.

About This Court

District of Massachusetts (D. Mass.) is a federal district court in the 1st Circuit, MA.

Case Timeline

1 event

info

Other May 8, 2026

3:26-cv-30029 Smith No. 100 v. May, Sr. et al

The court granted an extension of time for the defendants, May, Sr. et al, to file their answer in the Smith No. 100 v. May, Sr. et al case. The extension was granted for 15 days. This means the defendants now have more time to respond to the plaintiff's complaint.

description View filing open_in_new

newspaper

Press Coverage

1 article

All No paywall (1) Original reporting (1)

newspaper

Coverage

3:26-cv-30029 Smith No. 100 v. May, Sr. et al

Extension of Time to File Answer ( 15

May 8, 2026 · 1 min read