VITALE v. NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE et al
Case Summary
Judge denied the motion to dismiss in the case of Vitale v. New Jersey State Police, allowing the lawsuit to proceed. The lawsuit alleges that the New Jersey State Police engaged in a pattern of racial profiling and discriminatory policing practices. The judge's decision means that the case will move forward and the plaintiffs will have the opportunity to present their evidence.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Docket Snapshot
Court
D.N.J.
District of New Jersey · 3rd Circuit · NJ
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
2:22-cv-02619 VITALE v. NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE et al
Other · May 01, 2026
Coverage
1 article
1 source tracked
Participants
1 Defendant
2 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
This case is tied to District of New Jersey, a federal district court in NJ.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 01, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE and others.
Press monitoring has found 1 related article from 1 distinct source.
About This Court
District of New Jersey (D.N.J.) is a federal district court in the 3rd Circuit, NJ.
Case Timeline
1 event2:22-cv-02619 VITALE v. NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE et al
Judge denied the motion to dismiss in the case of Vitale v. New Jersey State Police, allowing the lawsuit to proceed. The lawsuit alleges that the New Jersey State Police engaged in a pattern of racial profiling and discriminatory policing practices. The judge's decision means that the case will move forward and the plaintiffs will have the opportunity to present their evidence.
Press Coverage
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
1 outlet · 1 article
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
1 day, 4 hours ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.