Appeal record filed in Becton v. United States in SDNY at docket 24-cv-03439
Case Summary
The case Becton v. United States of America (24-cv-03439) in the Southern District of New York has progressed to the appellate stage. The appeal record has been transmitted to the United States Court of Appeals, indicating that the district court has completed its proceedings and the matter is now under appellate review.
Latest development
1:24-cv-03439 Becton v. United States of America
Appeal · May 11, 2026
The appeal record for Becton v. United States of America was sent electronically to the United States Court of Appeals. This means the case is moving from the trial court to the appellate court for review. The appellate court will now examine the trial court's decisions to determine if any legal errors occurred.
description View filingKey Issues
- • Appeal process
- • Federal government defendant
- • Record transmission
- • Appellate jurisdiction
Docket Snapshot
Court
S.D.N.Y.
Southern District of New York · 2nd Circuit · NY
Docket
Not captured
Appellate
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
Other
Other · May 12, 2026
Coverage
0 articles
0 sources tracked
Participants
Parties not parsed yet
0 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
This case is tied to Southern District of New York, a federal district court in NY.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 12, 2026.
Party extraction has not produced a reliable plaintiff/defendant graph yet, so no speculative names are shown.
No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.
The Story So Far
Becton v. United States of America, docket number 24-cv-03439 in the Southern District of New York, has moved into the appellate phase. The district court has completed its proceedings and transmitted the appeal record to the United States Court of Appeals as of May 11, 2026.
The case awaits assignment to a panel of appellate judges. The underlying dispute involves claims against the federal government, though specific allegations and procedural history remain under seal or unreported at this stage. The transfer of the record signals that the district court has issued a final judgment or order subject to appeal.
The appellate court will now review the trial court’s rulings for legal errors. The absence of a judge assignment at the district level suggests the case may have been resolved or administratively closed prior to appeal. The docket remains active, indicating ongoing judicial activity.
Parties will likely file briefs and motions in the appellate court next. The outcome could affect federal liability standards or procedural rules, depending on the issues raised. Observers should track filings in the Second Circuit to follow the case’s progress and any significant rulings on appeal.
update What Changed This Week
receipt_long Source (filing) expand_more
Appeal Record Sent to USCA - Electronic File
Open original open_in_newJuryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.
About This Court
Southern District of New York (S.D.N.Y.) is a federal district court in the 2nd Circuit, NY.
Case Timeline
2 eventsIn Becton v. United States of America, a party filed an objection during the proceedings. This action signals a dispute over a specific issue in the case that the objecting party wants the court to reconsider. Objections can affect the court's rulings and the direction of the case.
1:24-cv-03439 Becton v. United States of America
The appeal record for Becton v. United States of America was sent electronically to the United States Court of Appeals. This means the case is moving from the trial court to the appellate court for review. The appellate court will now examine the trial court's decisions to determine if any legal errors occurred.
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
0 outlets · 0 articles
Timeline events
2 records on file
Last updated
21 hours, 43 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.