United States Appeals Criminal Case Against Henderson in Southern District of New York
Case Summary
The United States government appealed a criminal case against Henderson and others in the Southern District of New York. The appeal record has been sent electronically to the United States Court of Appeals. The appeal involves review of trial court decisions or sentencing issues.
Latest development
1:02-cr-00451-2 USA v. Henderson et al
Appeal · May 11, 2026
The appeal record for USA v. Henderson et al was sent electronically to the United States Court of Appeals. This means the case is moving from the trial court to the appellate level for review. Lawyers and judges at the appellate court will now examine the trial record to decide if any legal errors occurred.
description View filingKey Issues
- • Criminal appeal
- • Trial court review
- • Sentencing or procedural issues
Docket Snapshot
Court
S.D.N.Y.
Southern District of New York · 2nd Circuit · NY
Docket
Not captured
Criminal
Stage
Appeal in progress
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
1:02-cr-00451-2 USA v. Henderson et al
Appeal · May 11, 2026
Coverage
0 articles
0 sources tracked
Participants
Parties not parsed yet
1 linked entity
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
This case is tied to Southern District of New York, a federal district court in NY.
The newest docket activity we have is a appeal dated May 11, 2026.
Party extraction has not produced a reliable plaintiff/defendant graph yet, so no speculative names are shown.
No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.
The Story So Far
The appeal record in USA v. Henderson et al, docket number 02-cr-00451 in the Southern District of New York, was sent electronically to the United States Court of Appeals on May 11, 2026. This transfer signals that the case has concluded its trial court phase and is now under appellate review.
The case remains active, but no trial judge has been assigned publicly, suggesting the trial court proceedings may have been handled by a magistrate or the record is incomplete in public filings. The appeal likely challenges aspects of the trial court’s rulings or convictions against Henderson and co-defendants.
The docket offers no details on the underlying charges or the grounds for appeal, leaving the specific legal issues unclear. The Southern District of New York is known for handling complex criminal cases, so the appeal could involve significant questions of law or procedure.
The appellate court will now review the trial record, the parties’ briefs, and any oral arguments before issuing a decision. The timing and outcome of this appeal will determine whether the convictions or rulings below stand, are reversed, or require further proceedings.
The case’s public filings remain sparse, and no judge has been assigned to oversee any post-trial motions or sentencing at this stage. The movement to the appellate court marks a critical procedural shift, focusing attention on the legal merits rather than fact-finding.
update What Changed This Week
receipt_long Source (filing) expand_more
Appeal Record Sent to USCA - Electronic File
Open original open_in_newJuryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.
About This Court
Southern District of New York (S.D.N.Y.) is a federal district court in the 2nd Circuit, NY.
Case Timeline
1 event1:02-cr-00451-2 USA v. Henderson et al
The appeal record for USA v. Henderson et al was sent electronically to the United States Court of Appeals. This means the case is moving from the trial court to the appellate level for review. Lawyers and judges at the appellate court will now examine the trial record to decide if any legal errors occurred.
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
0 outlets · 0 articles
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
22 hours, 26 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.