Court orders unsealing of case against Empirical Healthcare in Central District of California
Case Summary
The United States and co-plaintiffs filed a civil action against Empirical Healthcare, Inc. and others in the Central District of California, docket 23-cv-03740. The court ordered the unsealing of the case, indicating prior confidentiality or sealed filings.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Key Issues
- • government enforcement
- • healthcare fraud
- • case unsealing
Docket Snapshot
Court
C.D. Cal.
Central District of California · 9th Circuit · CA
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
2:23-cv-03740 United States of America et al v. Empirical Healthcare, Inc. et al
Other · May 11, 2026
Coverage
0 articles
0 sources tracked
Participants
1 Defendant
1 linked entity
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
This case is tied to Central District of California, a federal district court in CA.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 11, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes Empirical Healthcare, Inc.
No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.
About This Court
Central District of California (C.D. Cal.) is a federal district court in the 9th Circuit, CA.
Case Timeline
1 event2:23-cv-03740 United States of America et al v. Empirical Healthcare, Inc. et al
The court unsealed the case United States of America et al v. Empirical Healthcare, Inc. et al, docket number 2:23-cv-03740. This action made the previously sealed filings and proceedings accessible to the public. It matters because unsealing signals the case may involve issues of public interest or transparency.
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
0 outlets · 0 articles
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
22 hours, 48 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.