Judge Meredith Grants Kevin Raica Pro Hac Vice Admission on April 16, 2026
Case Summary
The court granted Kevin Raica permission to appear pro hac vice on April 16, 2026. The order was signed by District Judge S. Chad Meredith and was filed by attorney Ricardo Hernandez-Navarrete with a $125 fee paid.
Latest development
VIRTUAL ORDER: granting 3 MOTION for Kevin Raica to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Ricardo Hernandez-Navarrete ( Filing fee $125; receipt number AKYEDC-6351953). Signed by District Judge S. Chad Meredith on 4/16/2026. (TJG)cc:
Order · May 12, 2026
The court granted the Motion for Kevin Raica to Appear Pro Hac Vice.
Key Issues
- • Pro hac vice admission
- • Attorney appearance
- • Court order
Docket Snapshot
Court
Court not identified
Awaiting court metadata
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Court order issued
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
VIRTUAL ORDER: granting 3 MOTION for Kevin Raica to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Ricardo Hernandez-Navarrete ( Filing fee
Order · May 12, 2026
Coverage
0 articles
0 sources tracked
Participants
1 Presiding Judge
1 linked entity
Judge
S. Chad Meredith
What the record shows
The court metadata has not been resolved yet, so Juryvine is keeping the page conservative until a reliable court match lands.
The newest docket activity we have is a order dated May 12, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes S. Chad Meredith.
No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.
The Story So Far
The court granted a motion allowing Kevin Raica to appear pro hac vice in this case. The order was signed by District Judge S. Chad Meredith on April 16, 2026.
The motion was filed by Ricardo Hernandez-Navarrete and included the required $125 filing fee. This procedural step permits Raica, who is not admitted to practice in this jurisdiction, to represent a party in this matter temporarily.
The case remains active, but the docket and underlying claims have not been publicly disclosed. The court’s virtual order confirms only the admission of Raica as counsel. No substantive rulings or motions have been recorded beyond this point.
The judge overseeing the case is S. Chad Meredith.
Granting pro hac vice status is a routine but necessary step when out-of-state attorneys seek to participate in federal litigation. It signals potential upcoming activity, such as filings or hearings involving Raica. The motion’s approval does not reflect on the merits or posture of the case itself.
At this stage, the case is in its early procedural phase. The court’s docket has not yet revealed any substantive motions, discovery disputes, or trial dates. The next filings may clarify the parties, claims, and issues at stake.
For now, the key development is the court’s authorization for Raica to join the legal team.
Watchers should monitor the docket for initial pleadings or motions that Raica might file. Those documents will provide insight into the case’s subject matter and trajectory. The court’s next orders or scheduling notices will also indicate how the litigation will proceed under Judge Meredith’s supervision.
update What Changed This Week
receipt_long Source expand_more
VIRTUAL ORDER: granting 3 MOTION for Kevin Raica to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Ricardo Hernandez-Navarrete ( Filing fee $125; receipt number AKYEDC-6351953). Signed by District Judge S. Chad Meredith on 4/16/2026. (TJG)cc: COR (Entered: 04/16/2026)
Juryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.
Case Timeline
1 eventVIRTUAL ORDER: granting 3 MOTION for Kevin Raica to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Ricardo Hernandez-Navarrete ( Filing fee $125; receipt number AKYEDC-6351953). Signed by District Judge S. Chad Meredith on 4/16/2026. (TJG)cc: COR (Entered: 04/16/2026)
The court granted the Motion for Kevin Raica to Appear Pro Hac Vice.
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
0 outlets · 0 articles
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
16 hours, 49 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.