US Files Motion on Sealed Pen Register and Trap and Trace in Florida Court
Case Summary
The United States filed a motion related to a sealed pen register and trap and trace order in the Southern District of Florida. The docket 26-mj-02765 reflects magistrate judge activity concerning warrants and applications.
Latest development
1:26-mj-02841-1 USA v. SEALED Pen Register / Trap & Trace
Order · May 12, 2026
A document was filed under seal.
description View filingKey Issues
- • Electronic surveillance
- • Pen register
- • Trap and trace
- • Search warrant procedures
Docket Snapshot
Court
S.D. Fla.
Southern District of Florida · 11th Circuit · FL
Docket
Not captured
Criminal
Stage
Court order issued
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
1:26-mj-02841-1 USA v. SEALED Pen Register / Trap & Trace
Order · May 12, 2026
Coverage
0 articles
0 sources tracked
Participants
Parties not parsed yet
0 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
This case is tied to Southern District of Florida, a federal district court in FL.
The newest docket activity we have is a order dated May 12, 2026.
Party extraction has not produced a reliable plaintiff/defendant graph yet, so no speculative names are shown.
No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.
The Story So Far
The Southern District of Florida is handling a sealed matter under docket number 26-mj-02765 involving the government and an unnamed party. The case centers on applications for pen register and trap and trace devices, tools used to capture dialing, routing, addressing, and signaling information from communications.
The filings remain under seal, preventing public disclosure of the target or the precise nature of the investigation. Multiple sealed orders were entered on May 12, 2026, indicating active judicial review but no public rulings or motions have been made available.
No judge has been assigned yet, and the case appears to be in its early stages, focused on the issuance or oversight of surveillance warrants. The government likely seeks to monitor communications as part of a criminal investigation, but details remain confidential due to the sensitive nature of the surveillance tools involved.
The docket shows no substantive pleadings or motions beyond the sealed orders, suggesting the matter is still procedural. The case will proceed under magistrate court supervision, consistent with standard practice for pen register and trap and trace warrant applications.
update What Changed This Week
receipt_long Source (filing) expand_more
Magistrate Judge Miscellaneous Matter: Warrants/Applications/Orders
Open original open_in_newreceipt_long Source (filing) expand_more
Magistrate Judge Miscellaneous Matter: Warrants/Applications/Orders
Open original open_in_newreceipt_long Source (filing) expand_more
Magistrate Judge Miscellaneous Matter: Warrants/Applications/Orders
Open original open_in_newreceipt_long Source (filing) expand_more
Magistrate Judge Miscellaneous Matter: Warrants/Applications/Orders
Open original open_in_newreceipt_long Source (filing) expand_more
Magistrate Judge Miscellaneous Matter: Warrants/Applications/Orders
Open original open_in_newJuryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.
About This Court
Southern District of Florida (S.D. Fla.) is a federal district court in the 11th Circuit, FL.
Case Timeline
5 events1:26-mj-02841-1 USA v. SEALED Pen Register / Trap & Trace
A document was filed under seal.
1:26-mj-02827-1 USA v. SEALED Pen Register / Trap & Trace
A document was filed under seal.
1:26-mj-02828-1 USA v. SEALED Pen Register / Trap & Trace
A document was filed under seal.
1:26-mj-02829-1 USA v. SEALED Pen Register / Trap & Trace
A document was filed under seal.
1:26-mj-02765-1 USA v. SEALED Pen Register / Trap & Trace
A document was filed under seal.
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
0 outlets · 0 articles
Timeline events
5 records on file
Last updated
26 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.