Sealed Application Filed Under 18 U.S.C. § 2703(d) in Southern District of Florida
Case Summary
A sealed application under 18 U.S.C. § 2703(d) was filed in the Southern District of Florida, docket number 26-mj-02824. The magistrate judge handled matters related to warrants, applications, or orders, likely involving electronic evidence or surveillance.
Latest development
1:26-mj-02825-1 USA v. Sealed Application and Order Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 2703(d)
Order · May 12, 2026
The court issued an order.
description View filingKey Issues
- • Electronic surveillance
- • Search warrants
- • 18 U.S.C. § 2703(d)
- • Magistrate judge orders
Docket Snapshot
Court
S.D. Fla.
Southern District of Florida · 11th Circuit · FL
Docket
Not captured
Criminal
Stage
Court order issued
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
1:26-mj-02825-1 USA v. Sealed Application and Order Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 2703(d)
Order · May 12, 2026
Coverage
0 articles
0 sources tracked
Participants
Parties not parsed yet
0 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
This case is tied to Southern District of Florida, a federal district court in FL.
The newest docket activity we have is a order dated May 12, 2026.
Party extraction has not produced a reliable plaintiff/defendant graph yet, so no speculative names are shown.
No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.
The Story So Far
The Southern District of Florida is handling a sealed application under 18 U.S.C. § 2703(d), which governs the government's request for court orders to obtain certain electronic communications records. The case, docket number 26-mj-02824, remains active but has not yet been assigned to a judge.
The government seeks a court order to access stored electronic data, likely involving a third party's records held by a service provider. The filings remain under seal, limiting public details about the target or the nature of the investigation.
On May 12, 2026, the court issued two orders related to the application, though the contents of these orders have not been disclosed publicly. This case falls under the category of magistrate judge miscellaneous matters, specifically involving warrants, applications, and orders for electronic evidence.
The lack of a judge assignment and sealed status suggest the matter is in its early stages or involves sensitive investigative material. The government’s use of a 2703(d) order indicates it is seeking less than probable cause but more than a subpoena standard to obtain the records.
The court’s role is to determine whether the government has met this standard to compel disclosure without violating privacy protections. Because the case is sealed, the public record offers no insight into the underlying criminal investigation or the identity of the parties involved.
The next steps will likely involve the court’s ruling on the application and any subsequent government action based on the order’s outcome.
update What Changed This Week
receipt_long Source (filing) expand_more
Magistrate Judge Miscellaneous Matter: Warrants/Applications/Orders
Open original open_in_newreceipt_long Source (filing) expand_more
Magistrate Judge Miscellaneous Matter: Warrants/Applications/Orders
Open original open_in_newJuryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.
About This Court
Southern District of Florida (S.D. Fla.) is a federal district court in the 11th Circuit, FL.
Case Timeline
2 events1:26-mj-02825-1 USA v. Sealed Application and Order Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 2703(d)
The court issued an order.
1:26-mj-02824-1 USA v. Sealed Application For an Order Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 2703(d)
The court issued an order.
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
0 outlets · 0 articles
Timeline events
2 records on file
Last updated
24 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.