USA v. Benitez, et.al
Case Summary
USA v. Benitez, et.al is a case with an unknown court and docket number 23-cr-00123. The current summary is a set or reset of hearings. The case type is criminal. The risk assessment is that the case is currently in a procedural phase with no significant developments reported.
Latest development
5:23-cr-00123-4 USA v. Benitez, et.al
Hearing · April 27, 2026
The court set a hearing for the USA v. Benitez case, which is a criminal case with multiple defendants. The hearing is scheduled for a specific date and time, and it will likely address various aspects of the case. This hearing is a critical step in the legal process, and its outcome may impact the defendants' futures.
description View filingKey Issues
- • Criminal charges and procedural posture
- • Charge status, plea posture, and court supervision
- • Current docket activity and next procedural step
Docket Snapshot
Court
N.D. Cal.
Northern District of California · 9th Circuit · CA
Docket
Not captured
Criminal
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
1:23-cr-00123-1 USA v. MARESCA et al
Other · May 06, 2026
Coverage
2 articles
2 sources tracked
Participants
1 Defendant
4 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
This case is tied to Northern District of California, a federal district court in CA.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 06, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes Benitez, et.al and others.
Press monitoring has found 2 related articles from 2 distinct sources.
The Story So Far
USA v. Benitez, et.al is an active criminal matter in Northern District of California under docket 23-cr-00123.
The main identified defendant or respondent is Benitez, et.al. The case is currently organized around Criminal charges and procedural posture, Charge status, plea posture, and court supervision, Current docket activity and next procedural step.
Benitez, et.al is a case with an unknown court and docket number 23-cr-00123. The current summary is a set or reset of hearings. The case type is criminal.
The risk assessment is that the case is currently in a procedural phase with no significant developments reported.
On May 6, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The court severed 269 counts in the case of USA v. Benitez, et.al. This means that the original indictment has been split into multiple separate charges.
The exact implications of this action are unclear at this time. On April 27, 2026, the docket recorded a hearing: The court set a hearing for the USA v. Benitez case, which is a criminal case with multiple defendants.
The hearing is scheduled for a specific date and time, and it will likely address various aspects of the case. This hearing is a critical step in the legal.
The next thing to watch is whether the latest other produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.
About This Court
Northern District of California (N.D. Cal.) is a federal district court in the 9th Circuit, CA.
Case Timeline
2 events1:23-cr-00123-1 USA v. MARESCA et al
The court severed 269 counts in the case of USA v. Benitez, et.al. This means that the original indictment has been split into multiple separate charges. The exact implications of this action are unclear at this time.
5:23-cr-00123-4 USA v. Benitez, et.al
The court set a hearing for the USA v. Benitez case, which is a criminal case with multiple defendants. The hearing is scheduled for a specific date and time, and it will likely address various aspects of the case. This hearing is a critical step in the legal process, and its outcome may impact the defendants' futures.
Coverage Timeline
Press Coverage
5:23-cr-00123-4 USA v. Benitez, et.al
~Util - Set/Reset Hearings ( 175
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
2 outlets · 2 articles
Timeline events
2 records on file
Last updated
8 hours, 34 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.