legal-news

KIRCHNER v. JOHNSON et al

25-cv-02735
Active Active litigation Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

A new case, Chiquito Subero v. Johnson et al, was filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, seeking a writ of habeas corpus. This petition is a civil case opening, indicating that the plaintiff is seeking relief from unlawful detention or imprisonment. The case is assigned docket number 5:26-cv-02163.

No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.

smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
Advertisement

Case Timeline

3 events
info
Other April 27, 2026

5:26-cv-02163 Chiquito Subero v. Johnson et al

A new case, Chiquito Subero v. Johnson et al, was filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, seeking a writ of habeas corpus. This petition is a civil case opening, indicating that the plaintiff is seeking relief from unlawful detention or imprisonment. The case is assigned docket number 5:26-cv-02163.

info
Other April 27, 2026

1:25-cv-02735 KIRCHNER v. JOHNSON et al

The court issued a notice in the case of Kirchner v. Johnson, indicating that a new filing has been made. The notice is a procedural step that alerts the parties and the court to the new development. This notice is a routine part of the court's process.

info
Other April 27, 2026

3:23-cv-50198 Stewart v. Johnson et al

The court substituted attorney 137 in the case of Stewart v. Johnson et al, which is related to the case of KIRCHNER v. JOHNSON et al. This substitution is likely a procedural move to ensure the case proceeds with a qualified attorney. The substitution may impact the case's timeline and strategy.

Advertisement
newspaper

Press Coverage

3 articles
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

3 outlets · 3 articles

Timeline events

3 records on file

Last updated

10 hours, 22 minutes ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.