legal-news

Hanan et al v. USCIS et al

23-cv-02414
Active Active litigation Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

The court held a teleconference on the case Hanan et al v. USCIS et al, which is related to the case Ali v. USCIS et al (3:24-cv-08657). The teleconference was held via Zoom. This event is a procedural step in the ongoing litigation.

No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.

smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
Advertisement

Case Timeline

4 events
info
Other April 27, 2026

3:24-cv-08657 Ali v. USCIS et al

The court held a teleconference on the case Hanan et al v. USCIS et al, which is related to the case Ali v. USCIS et al (3:24-cv-08657). The teleconference was held via Zoom. This event is a procedural step in the ongoing litigation.

info
Other April 27, 2026

0:26-cv-61240 ALZUGHAIBI v. USCIS et al

The court has been informed of a related case, 0:26-cv-61240 ALZUGHAIBI v. USCIS et al. This case is likely connected to the original case, Hanan et al v. The court's awareness of this case may impact the proceedings of the original case.

info
Other April 27, 2026

8:24-cv-01414 James Doe v. USCIS et al

A Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel was filed.

info
Other April 27, 2026

4:23-cv-02414 Hanan et al v. USCIS et al

The court granted a motion to stay the proceedings in the case Hanan et al v. USCIS et al, pending the outcome of a related case. This means that the current case will be put on hold until the other case is resolved. The stay will allow the parties to conserve resources and avoid duplicating efforts.

Advertisement
newspaper

Press Coverage

4 articles
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

3 outlets · 4 articles

Timeline events

4 records on file

Last updated

13 hours, 53 minutes ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.