USA moves to seal records in investigation under 18 U.S.C. § 1343 in California
Case Summary
The United States filed a motion to seal records in the Northern District of California related to an investigation under 18 U.S.C. § 1343 and other offenses. The motion seeks to protect sensitive information regarding accounts subject to a court order under 18 U.S.C. § 2703(d). The case involves federal criminal investigation procedures.
Latest development
5:26-xr-90799-1 USA v. Application by the United States for an Order Under 18 U.S.C. § 2703(d) for Accounts for Investigation of 18 U.S.C. § 1343 and Other Offenses
Order · May 12, 2026
The court issued an order.
description View filingKey Issues
- • Motion to seal
- • Federal investigation
- • Wire fraud statute
- • Privacy of records
Docket Snapshot
Court
N.D. Cal.
Northern District of California · 9th Circuit · CA
Docket
Not captured
Criminal
Stage
Court order issued
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
5:26-xr-90799-1 USA v. Application by the United States for an Order Under 18 U.S.C. § 2703(d) for Accounts for
Order · May 12, 2026
Coverage
0 articles
0 sources tracked
Participants
Parties not parsed yet
0 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
This case is tied to Northern District of California, a federal district court in CA.
The newest docket activity we have is a order dated May 12, 2026.
Party extraction has not produced a reliable plaintiff/defendant graph yet, so no speculative names are shown.
No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.
The Story So Far
The United States filed an application under 18 U.S.C. § 2703(d) seeking court authorization to access certain electronic accounts as part of an investigation into wire fraud under 18 U.S.C. § 1343 and related offenses.
The case is pending in the Northern District of California and currently lacks an assigned judge. The government’s request aims to compel service providers to disclose stored electronic communications and records tied to the accounts in question. The docket number is 26-xr-90799.
The case is active but at an early stage. The government has filed a motion to seal parts of the record, likely to protect sensitive investigative details. On May 12, 2026, the court issued an order, though the content of that order has not been publicly disclosed.
The absence of a judge assignment suggests the court is still organizing the case docket and preparing for further proceedings.
This matter involves the intersection of digital privacy and criminal investigation. The government’s use of a § 2703(d) order indicates it is seeking a lower standard than probable cause to obtain electronic records, which may raise questions about the scope and limits of such orders.
The wire fraud charge under § 1343 typically involves schemes to defraud via electronic communications, making the electronic account data central to the investigation.
Watch for the court’s ruling on the motion to seal and any appointment of a judge to manage the case. Subsequent filings may include responses from service providers or motions challenging the scope of the government’s request. The case could set important precedents on the balance between investigative needs and privacy protections under federal law.
update What Changed This Week
receipt_long Source (filing) expand_more
Motion to Seal ( 3
Open original open_in_newJuryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.
About This Court
Northern District of California (N.D. Cal.) is a federal district court in the 9th Circuit, CA.
Case Timeline
1 event5:26-xr-90799-1 USA v. Application by the United States for an Order Under 18 U.S.C. § 2703(d) for Accounts for Investigation of 18 U.S.C. § 1343 and Other Offenses
The court issued an order.
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
0 outlets · 0 articles
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
11 hours, 14 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.