US Seeks Pen Register Order for Phones in Structuring and Money Laundering Probe
Case Summary
The United States filed an application for a Pen Register and Trap and Trace (PRTT) order targeting specific phone numbers. The investigation focuses on alleged structuring, money laundering, and related offenses in the Northern District of California. The court issued an order on a motion to seal certain documents in this matter, reflecting the sensitive nature of the investigation.
Latest development
3:26-mj-70670-1 Application by the United States for Search Warrant for Two Target Mobile Phones for Investigation of Structuring, Money Laundering, and Other Offenses
Order · May 12, 2026
A Motion was filed.
description View filingKey Issues
- • PRTT application
- • Structuring investigation
- • Money laundering allegations
- • Motion to seal
- • Northern District of California
Docket Snapshot
Court
N.D. Cal.
Northern District of California · 9th Circuit · CA
Docket
Not captured
Criminal
Stage
Court order issued
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
3:26-mj-70670-1 Application by the United States for Search Warrant for Two Target Mobile Phones for Investigation of
Order · May 12, 2026
Coverage
0 articles
0 sources tracked
Participants
Parties not parsed yet
0 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
This case is tied to Northern District of California, a federal district court in CA.
The newest docket activity we have is a order dated May 12, 2026.
Party extraction has not produced a reliable plaintiff/defendant graph yet, so no speculative names are shown.
No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.
The Story So Far
The United States filed an application seeking a Pen Register and Trap and Trace (PRTT) order targeting specific phone numbers. The investigation focuses on alleged structuring, money laundering, and related offenses. The case is docketed as 26-xr-90802 in the Northern District of California.
The court has not yet assigned a judge. The government moved to seal parts of the record, and the court issued an order on that motion on May 12, 2026. The details of the underlying investigation remain under seal, limiting public information about the scope and targets.
The case remains active, with no further public filings or hearings reported. The PRTT order would allow the government to collect dialing, routing, addressing, and signaling information from the targeted phone numbers, a tool often used in investigations involving financial crimes.
The court’s order on the sealing motion suggests a sensitivity to protecting investigative details at this stage. The absence of a judge assignment and limited docket activity indicate the case is in early procedural phases.
The government’s pursuit of electronic surveillance reflects a broader strategy to trace illicit financial flows in suspected money laundering schemes.
update What Changed This Week
receipt_long Source (filing) expand_more
Order on Motion to Seal ( 4
Open original open_in_newreceipt_long Source (filing) expand_more
Order on Motion to Seal ( 3
Open original open_in_newJuryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.
About This Court
Northern District of California (N.D. Cal.) is a federal district court in the 9th Circuit, CA.
Case Timeline
2 events3:26-mj-70670-1 Application by the United States for Search Warrant for Two Target Mobile Phones for Investigation of Structuring, Money Laundering, and Other Offenses
A Motion was filed.
3:26-xr-90802-1 USA v. Application by the United States for an Order for a PRTT for Target Phone Numbers for Investigation of Structuring, Money Laundering, and Other Offenses
The court issued an order.
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
0 outlets · 0 articles
Timeline events
2 records on file
Last updated
12 hours, 7 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.