TEXT ORDER setting briefing schedule re 62 Motion for Summary Judgment and Motion for Reconsideration - A response to the motion is due on or before August 2, 2023. A reply, if any, is due on or before August 16, 2023. All submissions should comply with "Appendix II" attached to the Initial Order. Signed by Judge Annemarie Carney Axon on 7/11/23. (SAC) (Entered: 07/11/2023)
Case Summary
TEXT ORDER setting briefing schedule re 62 Motion for Summary Judgment and Motion for Reconsideration - A response to the motion is due on or before August 2, 2023. A reply, if any, is due on or before August 16, 2023. All submissions should comply with "Appendix II" attached to the Initial Order. Signed by Judge Annemarie Carney Axon on 7/11/23. (SAC) (Entered: 07/11/2023)
Latest development
TEXT ORDER setting briefing schedule re 62 Motion for Summary Judgment and Motion for Reconsideration - A response to the motion is due on or before August 2, 2023. A reply, if any, is due on or before August 16, 2023.
Order · May 13, 2026
A Motion was filed.
Docket Snapshot
Court
Court not identified
Awaiting court metadata
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Court order issued
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
TEXT ORDER setting briefing schedule re 62 Motion for Summary Judgment and Motion for Reconsideration - A response to
Order · May 13, 2026
Coverage
0 articles
0 sources tracked
Participants
1 Presiding Judge
1 linked entity
Judge
Annemarie Carney Axon
What the record shows
The court metadata has not been resolved yet, so Juryvine is keeping the page conservative until a reliable court match lands.
The newest docket activity we have is a order dated May 13, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes Annemarie Carney Axon.
No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.
The Story So Far
Judge Annemarie Carney Axon set a briefing schedule on July 11, 2023, for two pending motions: a Motion for Summary Judgment and a Motion for Reconsideration. The court requires responses to these motions by August 2, 2023. Any reply briefs must be submitted by August 16, 2023.
The judge instructed the parties to follow the formatting and procedural rules outlined in "Appendix II" of the Initial Order. This order clarifies the timeline for the parties to present their arguments on these dispositive and potentially case-altering motions.
The Motion for Summary Judgment challenges the legal sufficiency of the opposing party's claims, aiming to resolve the case without trial. The Motion for Reconsideration seeks to revisit a prior ruling, likely addressing alleged errors or overlooked facts. The court has not yet ruled on either motion.
The docket number and court remain unspecified, but the case is active and moving through pretrial stages. The next filings will shape whether the case proceeds to trial or narrows in scope. The judge’s order signals a focus on procedural compliance and timely briefing to keep the case on track.
update What Changed This Week
receipt_long Source expand_more
TEXT ORDER setting briefing schedule re 62 Motion for Summary Judgment and Motion for Reconsideration - A response to the motion is due on or before August 2, 2023. A reply, if any, is due on or before August 16, 2023. All submissions should comply with "Appendix II" attached to the Initial Order. Signed by Judge Annemarie Carney Axon on 7/11/23. (SAC) (Entered: 07/11/2023)
Juryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.
Case Timeline
1 eventTEXT ORDER setting briefing schedule re 62 Motion for Summary Judgment and Motion for Reconsideration - A response to the motion is due on or before August 2, 2023. A reply, if any, is due on or before August 16, 2023. All submissions should comply with "Appendix II" attached to the Initial Order. Signed by Judge
A Motion was filed.
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
0 outlets · 0 articles
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
40 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.