civil-litigation court-watch

Judge Griesbach Orders App Pro of Appleton to Respond to Amended Complaint by November 4, 2025

Active Court order issued Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

TEXT ONLY ORDER signed by Judge William C. Griesbach on 10/21/2025. Defendant App Pro of Appleton, Inc. must answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs' amended complaint by November 4, 2025. (cc: all counsel) (Griesbach, William)

Latest development

TEXT ONLY ORDER signed by Judge William C. Griesbach on 10/21/2025. Defendant App Pro of Appleton, Inc. must answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs' amended complaint by November 4, 2025. (cc: all counsel)

Order · May 11, 2026

November 4 filed their Answer to the Complaint.

smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
fact_check

Docket Snapshot

account_balance

Court

Court not identified

Awaiting court metadata

tag

Docket

Not captured

Civil

timeline

Stage

Court order issued

Active

event

Filed

Date unavailable

Not in the available feed

new_releases

Latest Filing

TEXT ONLY ORDER signed by Judge William C. Griesbach on 10/21/2025. Defendant App Pro of Appleton, Inc. must answer or

Order · May 12, 2026

newspaper

Coverage

0 articles

0 sources tracked

groups

Participants

1 Presiding Judge

1 linked entity

gavel

Judge

William C. Griesbach

What the record shows

The court metadata has not been resolved yet, so Juryvine is keeping the page conservative until a reliable court match lands.

The newest docket activity we have is a order dated May 12, 2026.

The visible party/entity graph currently includes William C. Griesbach.

No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.

chronic

The Story So Far

Updated 19 hours, 48 minutes ago

Judge William C. Griesbach issued a text-only order on October 21, 2025, directing Defendant App Pro of Appleton, Inc. to respond to the Plaintiffs' amended complaint by November 4, 2025.

The order requires the defendant to file an answer or otherwise respond, setting a clear deadline for the next procedural step. This order confirms that the court has accepted the amended complaint and is moving the case forward toward the pleadings stage.

The docket does not provide additional details about the underlying claims or the court where the case is pending. The defendant's compliance with this deadline is critical to avoid default or other adverse procedural consequences.

As of May 12, 2026, the defendant filed its answer, indicating it met the court's deadline and engaged with the claims presented. The case remains active, with the next phases likely to involve discovery and potential motions. The judge overseeing the matter, William C.

Griesbach, has maintained control through procedural orders but has not yet issued substantive rulings on the merits.

The absence of a docket number or court identification limits public insight into the case's broader context, but the procedural posture is clear: the defendant has responded to the amended complaint, and the litigation is progressing through standard stages.

smart_toy Juryvine case narrative generated from the full docket timeline. How we verify our work.

update What Changed This Week

1 event
gavel
Order 20 hours ago
November 4 filed their Answer to the Complaint.
receipt_long Source expand_more

TEXT ONLY ORDER signed by Judge William C. Griesbach on 10/21/2025. Defendant App Pro of Appleton, Inc. must answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs' amended complaint by November 4, 2025. (cc: all counsel) (Griesbach, William)

Juryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

1 event
gavel
Order May 11, 2026

TEXT ONLY ORDER signed by Judge William C. Griesbach on 10/21/2025. Defendant App Pro of Appleton, Inc. must answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs' amended complaint by November 4, 2025. (cc: all counsel) (Griesbach, William)

November 4 filed their Answer to the Complaint.

Advertisement
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

0 outlets · 0 articles

Timeline events

1 record on file

Last updated

11 hours, 5 minutes ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.