USA and Jonathan Caravello Agree to Continue Briefing Schedule

The United States government filed a stipulation on May 12, 2026, to continue the briefing schedule related to a pending motion against defendant Jonathan Caravello. The filing included a proposed order to formalize the extension. This procedural move indicates that both parties require additional time to prepare their arguments or responses.

The case remains active, but the court has not yet assigned a judge to oversee it.

The stipulation follows earlier filings, including a miscellaneous document numbered 95, which appears central to the current briefing schedule. The nature of the underlying motion or dispute is not publicly detailed, but the extension suggests ongoing negotiation or complexity in the issues presented.

The court issued an order on May 13, 2026, presumably to approve the requested extension, although the specifics of that order are not disclosed.

Without a judge assigned, the case’s pace and direction remain uncertain. The extension of briefing deadlines typically signals that the parties are still shaping their legal positions or that discovery or other pretrial matters are unresolved. The lack of a docket number or court designation limits public insight into the case’s procedural posture or substantive claims.

Observers should watch for the appointment of a judge and the filing of the next substantive briefs. Those filings will clarify the legal issues at stake and may prompt motions or rulings that move the case toward resolution. The extension itself is a routine procedural step but highlights that the litigation is active and evolving.