Defendant Wrackkie Quiogue Seeks Multiple Sentencing Continuances Into May 2026
Case Summary
Defendant Wrackkie Quiogue filed an ex parte application to continue sentencing from February 25, 2026, to March 25, 2026. Later, a stipulation extended the sentencing date further from April 22, 2026, to May 6, 2026. These continuances suggest ongoing negotiations or preparation before sentencing.
Latest development
STIPULATION to Continue Sentencing from April 22, 2026 to May 6, 2026 filed by Defendant Wrackkie Quiogue (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Rosenfeld, Kathryn) (Entered: 04/19/2026)
Verdict · May 13, 2026
The court issued an order.
Key Issues
- • Sentencing continuance
- • Defendant's preparation
- • Court scheduling
Docket Snapshot
Court
Court not identified
Awaiting court metadata
Docket
Not captured
Criminal
Stage
Verdict entered
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
STIPULATION to Continue Sentencing from April 22, 2026 to May 6, 2026 filed by Defendant Wrackkie Quiogue (Attachments:
Verdict · May 13, 2026
Coverage
0 articles
0 sources tracked
Participants
Parties not parsed yet
0 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
The court metadata has not been resolved yet, so Juryvine is keeping the page conservative until a reliable court match lands.
The newest docket activity we have is a verdict dated May 13, 2026.
Party extraction has not produced a reliable plaintiff/defendant graph yet, so no speculative names are shown.
No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.
The Story So Far
Defendant Wrackkie Quiogue has sought multiple continuances of her sentencing date. The most recent filing, a stipulation dated April 19, 2026, moved the sentencing from April 22, 2026, to May 6, 2026. This follows an earlier ex parte application filed on February 24, 2026, which requested to push the sentencing from February 25, 2026, to March 25, 2026.
The court has not yet assigned a judge to the case. The docket number and court details remain undisclosed. The filings include proposed orders attached by counsel Kathryn Rosenfeld.
The court issued an order after the April 19 stipulation, but the content of that order has not been publicly detailed. The case remains active, with no sentencing date set beyond the May 6, 2026, continuance. The reasons for the continuances have not been specified in the public filings.
The pattern of requests suggests the defense is seeking additional time before sentencing, but the prosecution's position is not clear from available documents. The case's procedural posture is currently focused on scheduling rather than substantive rulings or motions.
Observers should watch for the court's response to the May 6 sentencing date and any further continuance requests or substantive filings that might clarify the case's trajectory.
update What Changed This Week
receipt_long Source expand_more
STIPULATION to Continue Sentencing from April 22, 2026 to May 6, 2026 filed by Defendant Wrackkie Quiogue (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Rosenfeld, Kathryn) (Entered: 04/19/2026)
receipt_long Source expand_more
EX PARTE APPLICATION to Continue Sentencing from February 25, 2026 to March 25, 2026. Filed by Defendant Wrackkie Quiogue. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order) (Rosenfeld, Kathryn) (Entered: 02/24/2026)
Juryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.
Case Timeline
2 eventsSTIPULATION to Continue Sentencing from April 22, 2026 to May 6, 2026 filed by Defendant Wrackkie Quiogue (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Rosenfeld, Kathryn) (Entered: 04/19/2026)
The court issued an order.
EX PARTE APPLICATION to Continue Sentencing from February 25, 2026 to March 25, 2026. Filed by Defendant Wrackkie Quiogue. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order) (Rosenfeld, Kathryn) (Entered: 02/24/2026)
The court issued an order.
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
0 outlets · 0 articles
Timeline events
2 records on file
Last updated
17 hours, 12 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.