Judge Stotler issues stipulation on Franchise's non-opposition and Intertainment's defense abandonment
Case Summary
Judge Alicemarie H. Stotler issued a stipulation and order reflecting Franchise’s non-opposition to a motion in limine and Intertainment’s abandonment of an affirmative defense. This procedural development narrows the issues for trial and may weaken Intertainment’s position. The order was entered on November 4, 2002.
Latest development
STIPULATION and ORDER by Judge Alicemarie H. Stotler re Franchise's non-opp to motion in limine # 11 and Intertainment's abandonment of affirmative defense # 13 (see doc for speciffics) (mt) (Entered: 11/04/2002)
Order · May 10, 2026
A Motion was filed.
Key Issues
- • Non-opposition to motion in limine
- • Abandonment of affirmative defense
- • Pretrial motions
- • Issue narrowing
Docket Snapshot
Court
Court not identified
Awaiting court metadata
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Court order issued
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
STIPULATION and ORDER by Judge Alicemarie H. Stotler re Franchise's non-opp to motion in limine # 11 and
Order · May 10, 2026
Coverage
0 articles
0 sources tracked
Participants
1 Presiding Judge
1 linked entity
Judge
Alicemarie H. Stotler CR
What the record shows
The court metadata has not been resolved yet, so Juryvine is keeping the page conservative until a reliable court match lands.
The newest docket activity we have is a order dated May 10, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes Alicemarie H. Stotler CR.
No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.
The Story So Far
Judge Alicemarie H. Stotler issued a stipulation and order on November 4, 2002, addressing procedural developments in a dispute between Franchise and Intertainment. The order records Franchise's decision not to oppose motion in limine number 11.
At the same time, Intertainment formally abandoned its affirmative defense number 13. The specifics of these motions and defenses are detailed in the court docket but are not publicly summarized here. The judge's order reflects a narrowing of contested issues ahead of trial or further proceedings.
By removing opposition to the motion in limine and dropping an affirmative defense, the parties have streamlined the case's scope. This procedural step likely affects evidentiary rulings and the parties' strategic positions. The case remains active, but the docket does not provide further details on filings or the court's jurisdiction.
The next significant movement will likely involve rulings on the remaining motions in limine or scheduling of trial dates. The parties have signaled a willingness to limit disputes over certain evidence and defenses, which could accelerate pretrial preparation.
Observers should watch for any new motions or court orders clarifying how these changes affect the case's trajectory.
update What Changed This Week
receipt_long Source expand_more
STIPULATION and ORDER by Judge Alicemarie H. Stotler re Franchise's non-opp to motion in limine # 11 and Intertainment's abandonment of affirmative defense # 13 (see doc for speciffics) (mt) (Entered: 11/04/2002)
Juryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.
Case Timeline
1 eventSTIPULATION and ORDER by Judge Alicemarie H. Stotler re Franchise's non-opp to motion in limine # 11 and Intertainment's abandonment of affirmative defense # 13 (see doc for speciffics) (mt) (Entered: 11/04/2002)
A Motion was filed.
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
0 outlets · 0 articles
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
8 hours, 56 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.