civil-litigation court-watch

Judge Stotler issues stipulation on Franchise's non-opposition and Intertainment's defense abandonment

Active Court order issued Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

Judge Alicemarie H. Stotler issued a stipulation and order reflecting Franchise’s non-opposition to a motion in limine and Intertainment’s abandonment of an affirmative defense. This procedural development narrows the issues for trial and may weaken Intertainment’s position. The order was entered on November 4, 2002.

Latest development

STIPULATION and ORDER by Judge Alicemarie H. Stotler re Franchise's non-opp to motion in limine # 11 and Intertainment's abandonment of affirmative defense # 13 (see doc for speciffics) (mt) (Entered: 11/04/2002)

Order · May 10, 2026

A Motion was filed.

Key Issues

  • Non-opposition to motion in limine
  • Abandonment of affirmative defense
  • Pretrial motions
  • Issue narrowing
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
fact_check

Docket Snapshot

account_balance

Court

Court not identified

Awaiting court metadata

tag

Docket

Not captured

Civil

timeline

Stage

Court order issued

Active

event

Filed

Date unavailable

Not in the available feed

new_releases

Latest Filing

STIPULATION and ORDER by Judge Alicemarie H. Stotler re Franchise's non-opp to motion in limine # 11 and

Order · May 10, 2026

newspaper

Coverage

0 articles

0 sources tracked

groups

Participants

1 Presiding Judge

1 linked entity

gavel

Judge

Alicemarie H. Stotler CR

What the record shows

The court metadata has not been resolved yet, so Juryvine is keeping the page conservative until a reliable court match lands.

The newest docket activity we have is a order dated May 10, 2026.

The visible party/entity graph currently includes Alicemarie H. Stotler CR.

No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.

chronic

The Story So Far

Updated 22 hours, 46 minutes ago

Judge Alicemarie H. Stotler issued a stipulation and order on November 4, 2002, addressing procedural developments in a dispute between Franchise and Intertainment. The order records Franchise's decision not to oppose motion in limine number 11.

At the same time, Intertainment formally abandoned its affirmative defense number 13. The specifics of these motions and defenses are detailed in the court docket but are not publicly summarized here. The judge's order reflects a narrowing of contested issues ahead of trial or further proceedings.

By removing opposition to the motion in limine and dropping an affirmative defense, the parties have streamlined the case's scope. This procedural step likely affects evidentiary rulings and the parties' strategic positions. The case remains active, but the docket does not provide further details on filings or the court's jurisdiction.

The next significant movement will likely involve rulings on the remaining motions in limine or scheduling of trial dates. The parties have signaled a willingness to limit disputes over certain evidence and defenses, which could accelerate pretrial preparation.

Observers should watch for any new motions or court orders clarifying how these changes affect the case's trajectory.

smart_toy Juryvine case narrative generated from the full docket timeline. How we verify our work.

update What Changed This Week

1 event
gavel
Order 23 hours ago
A Motion was filed.
receipt_long Source expand_more

STIPULATION and ORDER by Judge Alicemarie H. Stotler re Franchise's non-opp to motion in limine # 11 and Intertainment's abandonment of affirmative defense # 13 (see doc for speciffics) (mt) (Entered: 11/04/2002)

Juryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

1 event
gavel
Order May 10, 2026

STIPULATION and ORDER by Judge Alicemarie H. Stotler re Franchise's non-opp to motion in limine # 11 and Intertainment's abandonment of affirmative defense # 13 (see doc for speciffics) (mt) (Entered: 11/04/2002)

A Motion was filed.

Advertisement
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

0 outlets · 0 articles

Timeline events

1 record on file

Last updated

8 hours, 56 minutes ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.