CONDITIONAL ORDER by Judge Alicemarie H. Stotler granting Alschuler Grossman Stein & Kahan's Ex parte application for withdrawal as attorneys of record and order establishing deadline of 1/31/03 for appearance of new counsel (see doc for specifics) (mt) (Entered: 12/12/2002)
Case Summary
Judge Alicemarie H. Stotler issued a conditional order granting Alschuler Grossman Stein & Kahan's ex parte application to withdraw as attorneys of record. The order set a deadline of January 31, 2003, for new counsel to appear, emphasizing the importance of continuous representation.
Latest development
CONDITIONAL ORDER by Judge Alicemarie H. Stotler granting Alschuler Grossman Stein & Kahan's ex parte application for withdrawal as attorneys of record and order establishing deadline of 1/31/03 for appearance of new
Order · May 10, 2026
Judge Alicemarie issued an order.
Key Issues
- • Conditional order
- • Counsel withdrawal
- • Deadline for new counsel appearance
Docket Snapshot
Court
Court not identified
Awaiting court metadata
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Court order issued
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
CONDITIONAL ORDER by Judge Alicemarie H. Stotler granting Alschuler Grossman Stein & Kahan's ex parte application for
Order · May 10, 2026
Coverage
0 articles
0 sources tracked
Participants
1 Presiding Judge
1 linked entity
Judge
Alicemarie H. Stotler CR
What the record shows
The court metadata has not been resolved yet, so Juryvine is keeping the page conservative until a reliable court match lands.
The newest docket activity we have is a order dated May 10, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes Alicemarie H. Stotler CR.
No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.
The Story So Far
Judge Alicemarie H. Stotler granted Alschuler Grossman Stein & Kahan's ex parte application to withdraw as attorneys of record on December 12, 2002. The order set a deadline of January 31, 2003, for the client to secure new counsel and have that counsel appear in the case.
This conditional withdrawal means the firm remains responsible until new representation files a notice of appearance. The docket and court details remain unspecified, but the case is still active as of the latest entry. The judge’s order aims to prevent delays by imposing a firm deadline for the transition of legal representation.
The absence of new counsel by the deadline could prompt further court action, including possible default or sanctions. The case’s underlying claims and parties are not identified in the available records. The procedural posture now centers on whether the client will meet the court’s deadline to avoid disruption in the litigation.
The withdrawal order reflects standard practice when attorneys seek to exit a case midstream, balancing the firm’s right to withdraw with the client’s need for continuous representation.
update What Changed This Week
receipt_long Source expand_more
CONDITIONAL ORDER by Judge Alicemarie H. Stotler granting Alschuler Grossman Stein & Kahan's ex parte application for withdrawal as attorneys of record and order establishing deadline of 1/31/03 for appearance of new counsel (see doc for specifics) (mt) (Entered: 12/12/2002)
Juryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.
Case Timeline
1 eventCONDITIONAL ORDER by Judge Alicemarie H. Stotler granting Alschuler Grossman Stein & Kahan's ex parte application for withdrawal as attorneys of record and order establishing deadline of 1/31/03 for appearance of new counsel (see doc for specifics) (mt) (Entered: 12/12/2002)
Judge Alicemarie issued an order.
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
0 outlets · 0 articles
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
10 hours, 38 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.