US Roche Medical files stipulated motion to change venue and extend response deadline
Case Summary
US Roche Medical and Prescription Plan filed a stipulated motion to change venue and request an extension of time to respond to the complaint. The motion includes a proposed order and was referred to Judge Dustin B. Pead on March 20, 2025.
Latest development
Stipulated MOTION to Change Venue and Request for Extension of Time to Respond to the Complaint filed by Defendant US Roche Medical and Prescription Plan. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order) Motions referred to
Order · May 10, 2026
Defendant US Roche Medical and Prescription Plan filed the Complaint that opens the case.
Key Issues
- • Venue change request
- • Extension of response deadline
- • Stipulated motion
- • Referral to judge
Docket Snapshot
Court
Court not identified
Awaiting court metadata
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Court order issued
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
Stipulated MOTION to Change Venue and Request for Extension of Time to Respond to the Complaint filed by Defendant US
Order · May 10, 2026
Coverage
0 articles
0 sources tracked
Participants
Parties not parsed yet
0 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
The court metadata has not been resolved yet, so Juryvine is keeping the page conservative until a reliable court match lands.
The newest docket activity we have is a order dated May 10, 2026.
Party extraction has not produced a reliable plaintiff/defendant graph yet, so no speculative names are shown.
No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.
The Story So Far
Defendant US Roche Medical and Prescription Plan has filed a stipulated motion to change venue and requested more time to respond to the complaint. The motion, submitted on March 20, 2025, asks the court to transfer the case to a different jurisdiction.
It also seeks an extension of the deadline for the defendant to file an answer or other responsive pleading. The motion includes a proposed order and has been referred to Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead for consideration.
The case currently lacks an assigned district judge, and the court has not yet ruled on the venue change or the extension request. The original complaint was filed by US Roche Medical and Prescription Plan on May 10, 2026, which appears to be a clerical error given the motion’s earlier date.
The venue change request suggests the parties agree that the case should proceed elsewhere, but the court’s decision will determine where the litigation will take place. The extension request indicates the defendant needs additional time to prepare its response, likely due to the venue uncertainty.
Watch for Magistrate Judge Pead’s ruling on the motion, which will set the procedural path forward and clarify the timeline for the defendant’s response. The venue ruling will affect which court hears the case and could impact the parties’ litigation strategy and scheduling.
update What Changed This Week
receipt_long Source expand_more
Stipulated MOTION to Change Venue and Request for Extension of Time to Respond to the Complaint filed by Defendant US Roche Medical and Prescription Plan. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order) Motions referred to Dustin B. Pead.(Tolman, Mark) (Entered: 03/20/2025)
Juryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.
Case Timeline
1 eventStipulated MOTION to Change Venue and Request for Extension of Time to Respond to the Complaint filed by Defendant US Roche Medical and Prescription Plan. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order) Motions referred to Dustin B. Pead.(Tolman, Mark) (Entered: 03/20/2025)
Defendant US Roche Medical and Prescription Plan filed the Complaint that opens the case.
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
0 outlets · 0 articles
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
8 hours, 45 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.