Judge Pead Grants Motion to Transfer Case to Northern District of California
Case Summary
Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead granted a motion to transfer venue to the Northern District of California on March 20, 2025. The deadline to respond to the complaint was extended to May 2, 2025, and all future filings must occur in the new district court.
Latest development
ORDER granting 13 Motion to Change Venue. The deadline to respond to the Complaint shall be continued by forty-two (42) days from the current March 21, 2025 deadline, to May 2, 2025. The response to the Complaint shall
Order · May 10, 2026
Judge Dustin granted Motion to Change Venue.
Key Issues
- • Motion to transfer venue
- • Extension of response deadline
- • Jurisdictional change
Docket Snapshot
Court
Court not identified
Awaiting court metadata
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Court order issued
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
ORDER granting 13 Motion to Change Venue. The deadline to respond to the Complaint shall be continued by forty-two (42)
Order · May 10, 2026
Coverage
0 articles
0 sources tracked
Participants
1 Presiding Judge
1 linked entity
Judge
Dustin B. Pead
What the record shows
The court metadata has not been resolved yet, so Juryvine is keeping the page conservative until a reliable court match lands.
The newest docket activity we have is a order dated May 10, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes Dustin B. Pead.
No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.
The Story So Far
Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead granted a motion to change venue on March 20, 2025. The case will move from its original court to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California.
The deadline for the defendant to respond to the complaint has been extended from March 21, 2025, to May 2, 2025, reflecting the transfer. The order directs that all future filings related to the complaint must be made in the Northern District of California.
The transfer indicates a shift in the procedural posture of the case, potentially affecting the parties’ litigation strategies and timelines. This venue change may reflect considerations such as convenience, jurisdictional appropriateness, or other procedural factors raised in the motion.
The case remains active following this order, with no further rulings issued yet. The docket number and original court remain unspecified in the public record. The next steps will unfold in the Northern District of California, where the case will proceed under that court’s local rules and judicial oversight.
update What Changed This Week
receipt_long Source expand_more
ORDER granting 13 Motion to Change Venue. The deadline to respond to the Complaint shall be continued by forty-two (42) days from the current March 21, 2025 deadline, to May 2, 2025. The response to the Complaint shall be filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. The case is hereby transferred to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead on 3/20/2025. (mh) (Entered: 03/20/2025)
Juryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.
Case Timeline
1 eventORDER granting 13 Motion to Change Venue. The deadline to respond to the Complaint shall be continued by forty-two (42) days from the current March 21, 2025 deadline, to May 2, 2025. The response to the Complaint shall be filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. The case is
Judge Dustin granted Motion to Change Venue.
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
0 outlets · 0 articles
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
3 hours, 58 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.