1:23-cv-02745 FUNCTIONAL GOVERNMENT INITIATIVE v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Status Report ( 26
The court sent a notice to Sean Jackson's counsel, informing them that they have the option to consent to proceed before a US Magistrate Judge in the case against the Internal Revenue Service. This notice is a standard procedure in federal cases, allowing the parties to choose whether to proceed before a Magistrate Judge or a District Judge. The decision to consent or not will impact the case's management and potential outcomes.
Latest development
Order · May 4, 2026
A Motion was filed.
description View filingCourt
D.D.C.
District of Columbia · D.C. Circuit · DC
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
1:23-cv-02745 FUNCTIONAL GOVERNMENT INITIATIVE v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Other · May 05, 2026
Coverage
4 articles
3 sources tracked
Participants
2 Defendants, 3 Plaintiffs
6 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
This case is tied to District of Columbia, a federal district court in DC.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 05, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes Internal Revenue Service, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, 2:26-cv-04430 Sean Jackson and others.
Press monitoring has found 4 related articles from 3 distinct sources.
Order on Motion to Dismiss ( 37
Open original open_in_newJuryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.
District of Columbia (D.D.C.) is a federal district court in the D.C. Circuit, DC.
The parties filed a joint status report.
A Motion was filed.
The court sent a notice to Sean Jackson's counsel, informing them that they have the option to consent to proceed before a US Magistrate Judge in the case against the Internal Revenue Service. This notice is a standard procedure in federal cases, allowing the parties to choose whether to proceed before a Magistrate Judge or a District Judge. The decision to consent or not will impact the case's management and potential outcomes.
The court set or reset deadlines in the case of American Center for Law and Justice v. Internal Revenue Service (1:21-cv-02269). This action affects the timeline for the case, potentially impacting the parties involved. The exact deadlines and their implications are not specified.
Status Report ( 26
Order on Motion to Dismiss ( 37
Notice to Counsel Re: Consent to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge - optional html form ( 6
~Util - Set/Reset Deadlines
Sources tracked
3 outlets · 4 articles
Timeline events
4 records on file
Last updated
1 day, 3 hours ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.