2:26-cv-04430 Sean Jackson v. Internal Revenue Service
Notice to Counsel Re: Consent to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge - optional html form ( 6
The court sent a notice to Sean Jackson's counsel, informing them that they have the option to consent to proceed before a US Magistrate Judge in the case against the Internal Revenue Service. This notice is a standard procedure in federal cases, allowing the parties to choose whether to proceed before a Magistrate Judge or a District Judge. The decision to consent or not will impact the case's progression and potential outcomes.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Court
Court not identified
Awaiting court metadata
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
2:26-cv-04430 Sean Jackson v. Internal Revenue Service
Other · May 04, 2026
Coverage
1 article
1 source tracked
Participants
1 Defendant, 1 Plaintiff
2 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
The court metadata has not been resolved yet, so Juryvine is keeping the page conservative until a reliable court match lands.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 04, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes Internal Revenue Service, 2:26-cv-04430 Sean Jackson.
Press monitoring has found 1 related article from 1 distinct source.
The court sent a notice to Sean Jackson's counsel, informing them that they have the option to consent to proceed before a US Magistrate Judge in the case against the Internal Revenue Service. This notice is a standard procedure in federal cases, allowing the parties to choose whether to proceed before a Magistrate Judge or a District Judge. The decision to consent or not will impact the case's progression and potential outcomes.
Notice to Counsel Re: Consent to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge - optional html form ( 6
Sources tracked
1 outlet · 1 article
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
3 days, 4 hours ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.