civil-litigation federal-courts court-watch

Samuel Elliot Roman v. Paramount Pictures Corporation et al

26-cv-00992 C.D. Cal.
Active Active litigation Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

A notice was filed in the case of Lady Cinderella Pousima v. TWU Local 555 et al, which is unrelated to Samuel Elliot Roman v. Paramount Pictures Corporation et al. The notice is about consent to proceed before a US Magistrate Judge, but it's optional. This means the parties involved can choose whether to have their case heard by a Magistrate Judge or a District Judge.

No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.

Key Issues

  • Federal jurisdiction and procedural posture
  • Current docket activity and next procedural step
  • Claims pleaded in the complaint and early case posture
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
fact_check

Docket Snapshot

account_balance

Court

C.D. Cal.

Central District of California · 9th Circuit · CA

tag

Docket

Not captured

Civil

timeline

Stage

Active litigation

Active

event

Filed

Date unavailable

Not in the available feed

new_releases

Latest Filing

8:26-cv-00992 Lady Cinderella Pousima v. TWU Local 555 et al

Other · May 04, 2026

newspaper

Coverage

2 articles

1 source tracked

groups

Participants

1 Defendant, 2 Plaintiffs

4 linked entities

gavel

Judge

Not assigned in feed

What the record shows

This case is tied to Central District of California, a federal district court in CA.

The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 04, 2026.

The visible party/entity graph currently includes Paramount Pictures Corporation, 2:26-cv-00992 Samuel Elliot Roman, 8:26-cv-00992 Lady Cinderella Pousima and others.

Press monitoring has found 2 related articles from 1 distinct source.

chronic

The Story So Far

Updated 3 hours, 47 minutes ago

Samuel Elliot Roman v. Paramount Pictures Corporation et al is an active civil matter in Central District of California under docket 26-cv-00992.

The dispute currently identifies 2:26-cv-00992 Samuel Elliot Roman and 8:26-cv-00992 Lady Cinderella Pousima on one side and Paramount Pictures Corporation on the other. The case is currently organized around Federal jurisdiction and procedural posture, Current docket activity and next procedural step, Claims pleaded in the complaint and early case posture.

The available docket gives enough signal to track the case, but not enough to overstate the merits. This page will become more useful as filings, orders, hearings, and party appearances add detail.

On May 4, 2026, the docket recorded a other: A notice was filed in the case of Lady Cinderella Pousima v. TWU Local 555 et al, which is unrelated to Samuel Elliot Roman v. Paramount Pictures Corporation et al.

The notice is about consent to proceed before a US Magistrate Judge, but it's optional. This. On April 30, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The court granted Paramount Pictures Corporation an extension to respond to Samuel Elliot Roman's lawsuit, giving them 30 days or less to file an answer.

This means they can delay their response to the allegations made against them. The extension was granted.

The next thing to watch is whether the latest other produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.

smart_toy Juryvine case narrative generated from the full docket timeline. How we verify our work.

About This Court

Central District of California (C.D. Cal.) is a federal district court in the 9th Circuit, CA.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

2 events
info
Other May 4, 2026

8:26-cv-00992 Lady Cinderella Pousima v. TWU Local 555 et al

A notice was filed in the case of Lady Cinderella Pousima v. TWU Local 555 et al, which is unrelated to Samuel Elliot Roman v. Paramount Pictures Corporation et al. The notice is about consent to proceed before a US Magistrate Judge, but it's optional. This means the parties involved can choose whether to have their case heard by a Magistrate Judge or a District Judge.

info
Other April 30, 2026

2:26-cv-00992 Samuel Elliot Roman v. Paramount Pictures Corporation et al

The court granted Paramount Pictures Corporation an extension to respond to Samuel Elliot Roman's lawsuit, giving them 30 days or less to file an answer. This means they can delay their response to the allegations made against them. The extension was granted without explanation.

Advertisement
show_chart

Coverage Timeline

newspaper

Press Coverage

2 articles
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

1 outlet · 2 articles

Timeline events

2 records on file

Last updated

3 hours, 47 minutes ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.