8:26-cv-00992 Lady Cinderella Pousima v. TWU Local 555 et al
Notice to Counsel Re: Consent to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge - optional html form ( 8
A notice was filed in the case of Lady Cinderella Pousima v. TWU Local 555 et al, which is unrelated to Samuel Elliot Roman v. Paramount Pictures Corporation et al. The notice is about consent to proceed before a US Magistrate Judge, but it's optional. This means the parties involved can choose whether to have their case heard by a Magistrate Judge or a District Judge.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Court
C.D. Cal.
Central District of California · 9th Circuit · CA
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
8:26-cv-00992 Lady Cinderella Pousima v. TWU Local 555 et al
Other · May 04, 2026
Coverage
2 articles
1 source tracked
Participants
1 Defendant, 2 Plaintiffs
4 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
This case is tied to Central District of California, a federal district court in CA.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 04, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes Paramount Pictures Corporation, 2:26-cv-00992 Samuel Elliot Roman, 8:26-cv-00992 Lady Cinderella Pousima and others.
Press monitoring has found 2 related articles from 1 distinct source.
Samuel Elliot Roman v. Paramount Pictures Corporation et al is an active civil matter in Central District of California under docket 26-cv-00992.
The dispute currently identifies 2:26-cv-00992 Samuel Elliot Roman and 8:26-cv-00992 Lady Cinderella Pousima on one side and Paramount Pictures Corporation on the other. The case is currently organized around Federal jurisdiction and procedural posture, Current docket activity and next procedural step, Claims pleaded in the complaint and early case posture.
The available docket gives enough signal to track the case, but not enough to overstate the merits. This page will become more useful as filings, orders, hearings, and party appearances add detail.
On May 4, 2026, the docket recorded a other: A notice was filed in the case of Lady Cinderella Pousima v. TWU Local 555 et al, which is unrelated to Samuel Elliot Roman v. Paramount Pictures Corporation et al.
The notice is about consent to proceed before a US Magistrate Judge, but it's optional. This. On April 30, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The court granted Paramount Pictures Corporation an extension to respond to Samuel Elliot Roman's lawsuit, giving them 30 days or less to file an answer.
This means they can delay their response to the allegations made against them. The extension was granted.
The next thing to watch is whether the latest other produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.
Central District of California (C.D. Cal.) is a federal district court in the 9th Circuit, CA.
A notice was filed in the case of Lady Cinderella Pousima v. TWU Local 555 et al, which is unrelated to Samuel Elliot Roman v. Paramount Pictures Corporation et al. The notice is about consent to proceed before a US Magistrate Judge, but it's optional. This means the parties involved can choose whether to have their case heard by a Magistrate Judge or a District Judge.
The court granted Paramount Pictures Corporation an extension to respond to Samuel Elliot Roman's lawsuit, giving them 30 days or less to file an answer. This means they can delay their response to the allegations made against them. The extension was granted without explanation.
Notice to Counsel Re: Consent to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge - optional html form ( 8
Extending Time to Answer (30 days or less) ( 14
Sources tracked
1 outlet · 2 articles
Timeline events
2 records on file
Last updated
3 hours, 47 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.