2:26-cv-04563 Marina Mikhailovna Ogneva v. USCIS et al
Notice to Counsel Re: Consent to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge - optional html form ( 5
The court sent a notice to the counsel for Marina Mikhailovna Ogneva, informing them that they have the option to consent to proceed before a US Magistrate Judge in the case 2:26-cv-04563. This notice is a standard procedure in federal cases, allowing the parties to choose whether to proceed before a Magistrate Judge or a District Judge. The decision to consent or not will impact the case's jurisdiction and potential outcomes.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Court
C.D. Cal.
Central District of California · 9th Circuit · CA
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
2:26-cv-04563 Marina Mikhailovna Ogneva v. USCIS et al
Other · May 03, 2026
Coverage
1 article
1 source tracked
Participants
1 Plaintiff
2 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
This case is tied to Central District of California, a federal district court in CA.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 03, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes 2:26-cv-04563 Marina Mikhailovna Ogneva and others.
Press monitoring has found 1 related article from 1 distinct source.
Central District of California (C.D. Cal.) is a federal district court in the 9th Circuit, CA.
The court sent a notice to the counsel for Marina Mikhailovna Ogneva, informing them that they have the option to consent to proceed before a US Magistrate Judge in the case 2:26-cv-04563. This notice is a standard procedure in federal cases, allowing the parties to choose whether to proceed before a Magistrate Judge or a District Judge. The decision to consent or not will impact the case's jurisdiction and potential outcomes.
Notice to Counsel Re: Consent to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge - optional html form ( 5
Sources tracked
1 outlet · 1 article
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
1 day, 5 hours ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.