1:20-cv-06189 Weston v. City of Chicago et al
Extension of Time ( 420
The court granted an extension of time for the case Weston v. City of Chicago et al, allowing the parties to proceed with the case. This extension is relevant to the Revol. Development, LLC et al v. City of Chicago et al case as it may impact the overall timeline and scheduling of the proceedings. The extension may also have implications for the parties involved in the Revol. Development case.
Stage
Active litigation
Timeline
5 events
Coverage
5 articles
Sources
1
Order on Motion for Protective Order ( 44
Open original open_in_newOrder on Motion for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery ( 48
Open original open_in_new~Util - Set/Reset Hearings ( 22
Open original open_in_newJuryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.
The court granted an extension of time for the case Weston v. City of Chicago et al, allowing the parties to proceed with the case. This extension is relevant to the Revol. Development, LLC et al v. City of Chicago et al case as it may impact the overall timeline and scheduling of the proceedings. The extension may also have implications for the parties involved in the Revol. Development case.
A Motion was filed.
The court granted an extension of time for the case 1:23-cv-03488 Lindsay v. City of Chicago, The et al. This means that the parties involved have more time to file their motions and responses. The extension is likely due to the complexity of the case or the need for additional time to prepare.
A Motion was filed.
The court set a hearing in the Revol. Development, LLC et al v. City of Chicago et al case. This hearing is related to utility issues. The court has scheduled a hearing to address these matters.
Extension of Time ( 420
Order on Motion for Protective Order ( 44
Extension of Time ( 76
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery ( 48
~Util - Set/Reset Hearings ( 22
Sources tracked
1 outlet · 5 articles
Timeline events
5 records on file
Last updated
5 days, 10 hours ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.