1:15-cv-10975 Dougherty et al v. City of Chicago
Miscellaneous Relief ( 538
The court granted miscellaneous relief in the case of Dougherty et al v. City of Chicago, case number 1:15-cv-10975. This means the court took action outside of the normal trial process to address a specific issue. The relief granted is not specified in the provided information.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
The court granted miscellaneous relief in the case of Dougherty et al v. City of Chicago, case number 1:15-cv-10975. This means the court took action outside of the normal trial process to address a specific issue. The relief granted is not specified in the provided information.
The court granted an extension of time for the City of Chicago to complete discovery in the Porter v. City of Chicago case, allowing them 60 days to comply. This extension gives the city more time to gather and exchange information with the plaintiff. The extension is significant because it may impact the overall timeline of the case.
The court granted reconsideration in Nanlawala v. City of Chicago, a case related to Troogstad v. City of Chicago. This means the court will re-examine a previous decision. The reconsideration was granted due to a filing by the plaintiff.
The court granted an extension of time for the City of Chicago in the Troogstad v. City of Chicago case, allowing them more time to respond to the plaintiff's claims. This extension is significant because it gives the City of Chicago more time to prepare their defense. The extension was granted on an unspecified date.
Miscellaneous Relief ( 538
Extension of Time to Complete Discovery ( 60
Sources tracked
1 outlet · 4 articles
Timeline events
4 records on file
Last updated
1 day, 14 hours ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.