Juryvine tracks Colorado Department across litigation, regulatory sagas, source feed signals, and related entities. This page shows what is present in the record and avoids inferring penalties, liability, or enforcement outcomes unless source documents support them.
Regulatory footprint
24
linked cases
24
active
7
courts
0
sagas
C.D. Cal. 26-cv-00924
The parties in Schamaun v. Scaringe et al filed a stipulation and proposed order in the Central District of California. The filing likely addresses procedural or discovery matters to streamline the case.
N.D. Cal. 26-cv-00872
In Cowan v. Colorado Department of Human Services, docket 26-cv-00872 in the Northern District of California, a motion to appoint a guardian or attorney ad litem was filed. This indicates a party may be a minor or incapacitated, requiring court-appointed representation to protect their interests during litigation involving welfare or guardianship issues.
C.D. Cal. 26-cv-00952
Newmont Corporation sued the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment in the Central District of California, docket number 26-cv-00952. The case involves regulatory or environmental disputes, with recent court memoranda indicating active judicial review of substantive or procedural issues.
E.D. Tex. 26-cv-00105
The court dismissed Runnals v. PHH Mortgage Corporation et al for lack of jurisdiction in the Eastern District of Texas, docket number 3:26-cv-00105. The dismissal ends the case in this forum due to the court's inability to hear the claims.
C.D. Cal. 25-cv-02098
Cement Masons' Local 780 Pension Fund and others filed suit against Quest Concrete Corp. in the Central District of California, docket 25-cv-02098. A status report was submitted, providing updates on case progress, discovery, or settlement efforts, though the claims' substance remains unspecified.
D. Colo. 25-cv-02588
Wright v. Smart ERP Solutions, Inc. in the District of Colorado, docket number 25-cv-02588, involves a plaintiff's opposition to a motion. The filing shows active litigation with contested procedural or substantive issues, possibly related to software or enterprise resource planning services.
N.D. Ill. 25-cv-03167
Miller sued the Colorado Department of Revenue in the Northern District of Illinois, docket number 1:25-cv-03167. The dispute likely involves administrative or tax law issues given the defendant's status as a state agency. The case remains in early or intermediate procedural phases without substantive rulings.
D.N.J. 23-cv-06383
Walker filed a civil suit against the New Jersey Department of Correction and other defendants under docket 23-cv-06383. The court granted an extension for the defendants to respond to the complaint, indicating the case is in early procedural stages. The extension delays the defendants' obligation to answer or move.
D. Colo. 24-cv-01370
Mangayi sued the Colorado Department of Human Services, docket 24-cv-01370. The court set a hearing on a pending motion, indicating active litigation on a contested issue — likely a dispositive motion or a discovery dispute. Suits against state human services agencies typically involve employment discrimination, wrongful termination, denial of benefits, or
D. Del. 24-cv-01227
A notice of service was filed in Lindsay v. Aishling, LLC et al in the District of Delaware, docket 24-cv-01227. This filing confirms that parties have been formally served, advancing the case toward active litigation.
D. Colo. 26-cv-01816
Ricky Buentipo filed a civil lawsuit against Cenlar, FSB in the District of Colorado alleging damages from a clerical error during an intradistrict transfer. The dispute centers on alleged mishandling of documents or accounts causing harm to Buentipo.
D. Colo. 26-cv-01827
FRANCIS et al v. VISCOMI et al, docket 26-cv-01827 in the District of Colorado, is a civil case with no publicly available details on claims or procedural status. The lack of information limits insight into the dispute's nature or progress.
D. Colo. 26-cv-01252
Jawara v. Blanche et al, docket 26-cv-01252 in the District of Colorado, involves an unspecified dispute. The available filings do not clarify the claims, factual background, or procedural posture, leaving the nature of the case unknown.
D.N.J. 26-cv-00996
Johnson sued the Colorado Department of Corrections in the District of New Jersey over restrictions on services within the correctional system. The court addressed how these limitations affect inmates or staff and whether they comply with applicable standards and rights.
E.D. Tex. 25-cv-01095
Cooper sued RXO Express, LLC and other defendants in the Eastern District of Texas, docket 25-cv-01095. The court addressed a motion to vacate a prior order or judgment, signaling a procedural challenge to an earlier decision in the case.
C.D. Cal. 26-cv-01070
Perea (PS) filed a motion to appoint pro bono counsel in a case against the Colorado Department of Corrections Mail Room and others in the Central District of California, docket 26-cv-01070. The motion signals the plaintiff's need for legal representation at no cost.
D. Colo. 26-cv-01344
Nettles filed a case against Gonzalez and others in the District of Colorado. The docket provides minimal information, and the case summary is incomplete, leaving the nature of the dispute unclear.
D. Colo. 26-cv-01509
Raikos and co-plaintiffs filed suit against Kellman and co-defendants under docket 26-cv-01509. The 2026 filing date makes this a recently initiated civil action. No complaint summary, cause of action, or court is identified in the available record. The multi-party structure on both sides suggests a business dispute, partnership dissolution, or tort claim
N.D. Cal. 26-cv-02000
The case of English v. CRST Expedited, Inc. et al involves a certificate/notice of interested parties. This case demonstrates the importance of notifying interested parties in civil litigation. The case is currently pending in U.S. District Court, with docket number 26-cv-02000. The court's decision will have significant implications for the notification
D. Colo. 24-cv-00908
Strumpf v. Colorado Department of Corrections is a civil case filed under docket number 24-cv-00908. The case is currently pending in an unknown court. The case involves a lawsuit against the Colorado Department of Corrections, but the details of the case are not publicly available.
D. Colo.
James K. Bishop brought a case against the Ohio Department of Corrections and related parties. The District of Colorado court issued an opinion addressing issues arising from this dispute, though the exact legal matters remain unspecified.
D. Colo. 25-cv-01064
Gregory Langadinos filed a civil lawsuit against the City of Corona and other defendants in the District of Colorado. The docket 25-cv-01064 confirms a civil dispute, but the claims and procedural details remain unspecified. The case appears active with motions or orders filed.
D.N.J. 21-cv-01100
Mackes et al v. Colorado Department of Corrections involved a minute order. The details of the minute order are not specified. This decision was made in a civil case, with docket number 21-cv-01100. The case details are currently unknown.
D. Colo. 24-cv-02797
The Colorado Department of Corrections is facing a lawsuit in federal court. The lawsuit, which was filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado, alleges that the department has failed to provide adequate medical care to inmates. The case is currently pending in the court.
In Plaintiff moves for pro bono counsel in Perea v. Colorado Department of Corrections Mail Room
In Court dismisses Runnals v. PHH Mortgage for lack of jurisdiction in Texas
In Status Report Filed in Cement Masons' Local 780 Pension Fund v. Quest Concrete Corp.
In Stipulation and proposed order filed in Schamaun v. Scaringe in Central District of California
In Nettles Files Civil Suit Against Gonzalez and Others in District of Colorado
In Eastern District of Texas court reviews motion to vacate order in Cooper v. RXO Express
In Stipulation and proposed order filed in Schamaun v. Scaringe in Central District of California
In Jawara v. Blanche filed in District of Colorado with unclear claims