1:24-cv-01370 Mangayi v. Colorado Department of Human Services
Order Setting Hearing on Motion
Mangayi sued the Colorado Department of Human Services, docket 24-cv-01370. The court set a hearing on a pending motion, indicating active litigation on a contested issue — likely a dispositive motion or a discovery dispute. Suits against state human services agencies typically involve employment discrimination, wrongful termination, denial of benefits, or civil rights claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The department may assert Eleventh Amendment immunity depending on the claims and relief sought.
Latest development
Order · April 20, 2026
A Motion was filed.
description View filingA motion is pending in Mangayi v. Colorado Department of Human Services, No. 24-cv-01370, and the court has set a hearing on it.
That is the sum of what the public docket currently shows.
The case was filed in 2024 against the Colorado Department of Human Services. No judge assignment appears in the available record. The underlying claims are not yet described in the docket entries on file.
The April 20, 2026 order setting a hearing is the only substantive docket event visible here. What motion triggered that order — and who filed it — is not clear from the current record. Until the hearing transcript or a ruling surfaces, the legal theory driving this case stays opaque.
The Colorado Department of Human Services is a state agency. Cases against it in federal court typically raise civil rights claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, disability discrimination under the Americans with Disabilities Act, or employment disputes.
None of those theories can be confirmed here without the complaint.
Order Setting Hearing on Motion
Open original open_in_newJuryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.
A Motion was filed.
Order Setting Hearing on Motion
Sources tracked
1 outlet · 1 article
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
1 hour, 13 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.