legal-news

1:23-cv-06383 Walker v. Department of Correction et al

updateUpdated 1 day ago
23-cv-06383 Filed
Active Court order issued Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

Walker v. Department of Correction et al. is a civil lawsuit filed under docket number 23-cv-06383. The case involves the plaintiff Walker against the Department of Correction and other defendants. The most recent docket entry grants an extension of time for the defendants to file an answer or otherwise respond to the complaint, indicating early procedural stages.

Stage

Court order issued

Timeline

3 events

Coverage

3 articles

Sources

1

Key Issues

  • Correctional facility conditions
  • Civil rights
  • Procedural deadlines

update What Changed This Week

3 events 3 articles
Advertisement

Case Timeline

3 events
gavel
Order April 15, 2026

2:22-cv-00621 SAUNDERS v. NJ DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al

The court issued an order regarding a motion that was reviewed by a magistrate judge in the case Saunders v. New Jersey Department of Corrections. This means the judge has made a decision or provided instructions related to a specific request in the case. Such orders help move the case forward by resolving procedural or substantive issues.

info
Other April 15, 2026

1:25-cv-03843 Blake v. Colorado Department of Corrections et al

In the case Blake v. Colorado Department of Corrections, the court granted an extension of time for the defendants to file their answer or respond to the complaint. This means the defendants have more time to prepare their legal response, which can affect the timeline of the case. Extensions like this are common and help ensure that all parties have adequate time to present their positions.

info
Other April 15, 2026

1:23-cv-06383 Walker v. Department of Correction et al

In the case Walker v. Department of Correction et al, the court received mail that was returned undelivered. This indicates that communication attempts related to the case did not reach the intended recipient. It matters because it may delay proceedings or require updated contact information to continue the case smoothly.

Advertisement
show_chart

Coverage Timeline

newspaper

Press Coverage

3 articles