civil-litigation court-watch

Court permits defendant Jung Kim to file motion for summary judgment without pre-motion conference

Active Court order issued Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

The court waived the requirement for a pre-motion conference and allowed defendant Jung Kim to file a motion for summary judgment. The motion must be served by November 6, 2023, with plaintiff's opposition due by a later date not specified here.

Latest development

ORDER: The court has reviewed the parties' pre-motion letters concerning defendant Jung Kim's motion for summary judgment and determined that a pre-motion conference is not necessary. The court grants defendant Jung Kim

Order · May 11, 2026

A Motion was filed.

Key Issues

  • Summary judgment motion
  • Pre-motion conference waived
  • Briefing schedule
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
fact_check

Docket Snapshot

account_balance

Court

Court not identified

Awaiting court metadata

tag

Docket

Not captured

Civil

timeline

Stage

Court order issued

Active

event

Filed

Date unavailable

Not in the available feed

new_releases

Latest Filing

ORDER: The court has reviewed the parties' pre-motion letters concerning defendant Jung Kim's motion for summary

Order · May 11, 2026

newspaper

Coverage

0 articles

0 sources tracked

groups

Participants

1 Presiding Judge

1 linked entity

gavel

Judge

Allyne R. Ross

What the record shows

The court metadata has not been resolved yet, so Juryvine is keeping the page conservative until a reliable court match lands.

The newest docket activity we have is a order dated May 11, 2026.

The visible party/entity graph currently includes Allyne R. Ross.

No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.

chronic

The Story So Far

Updated 10 hours, 37 minutes ago

Judge Allyne R. Ross has authorized defendant Jung Kim to file a motion for summary judgment, bypassing the usual pre-motion conference. The court reviewed pre-motion letters from both parties and concluded that a conference was unnecessary.

The order sets a strict briefing schedule. Defendant Kim must serve the motion and supporting documents by November 6, 2023. Plaintiff must serve opposition papers by November 20, 2023.

Defendant Kim may serve reply papers by November 29, 2023. All motion documents must comply with chambers' filing rules, including providing courtesy copies, and be filed by November 29, 2023. The court's order emphasizes procedural compliance and timeliness.

The case remains active, but the docket number and court are not publicly disclosed. This step signals a move toward resolving the case on legal grounds without a trial. The summary judgment motion will test whether the plaintiff can prove any disputed material facts that require a trial.

Judge Ross’s decision to skip the pre-motion conference suggests the issues are straightforward enough to proceed directly to briefing. The parties must now focus on meeting the court’s deadlines and preparing thorough legal arguments. The outcome of the summary judgment motion will shape the case’s future trajectory.

smart_toy Juryvine case narrative generated from the full docket timeline. How we verify our work.

update What Changed This Week

1 event
gavel
Order 10 hours ago
A Motion was filed.
receipt_long Source expand_more

ORDER: The court has reviewed the parties' pre-motion letters concerning defendant Jung Kim's motion for summary judgment and determined that a pre-motion conference is not necessary. The court grants defendant Jung Kim permission to bring the proposed motion. The court directs that defendant Jung Kim's motion shall be briefed as follows: Defendant Jung Kim's motion and supporting papers shall be served no later than November 6, 2023; plaintiff's opposition papers shall be served no later than N

Juryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

1 event
gavel
Order May 11, 2026

ORDER: The court has reviewed the parties' pre-motion letters concerning defendant Jung Kim's motion for summary judgment and determined that a pre-motion conference is not necessary. The court grants defendant Jung Kim permission to bring the proposed motion. The court directs that defendant Jung Kim's motion shall

A Motion was filed.

Advertisement
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

0 outlets · 0 articles

Timeline events

1 record on file

Last updated

6 hours, 25 minutes ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.