ORDER granting 13 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. All Defendants shall answer, move or otherwise respond to the complaint by 7/5/2024. Any party wishing to file a dispositive motion should consult District Judge Ramon E. Reyes, Jr.'s Individual Rules. Ordered by Magistrate Judge James R. Cho on 5/7/2024. (SGC)
Case Summary
The court granted a motion for extension of time for all defendants to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint by July 5, 2024. The order reminded parties to consult District Judge Ramon E. Reyes, Jr.'s individual rules before filing dispositive motions. The extension provides defendants additional time to prepare their responses.
Latest development
ORDER granting 13 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. All Defendants shall answer, move or otherwise respond to the complaint by 7/5/2024. Any party wishing to file a dispositive motion should consult District Judge
Order · May 11, 2026
Judge Ramon granted Motion for Extension of Time to Answer.
Key Issues
- • Extension of time to answer
- • All defendants affected
- • Reminder on dispositive motion rules
Docket Snapshot
Court
Court not identified
Awaiting court metadata
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Court order issued
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
ORDER granting 13 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. All Defendants shall answer, move or otherwise respond to the
Order · May 11, 2026
Coverage
0 articles
0 sources tracked
Participants
1 Presiding Judge
2 linked entities
Judge
Ramon E. Reyes
What the record shows
The court metadata has not been resolved yet, so Juryvine is keeping the page conservative until a reliable court match lands.
The newest docket activity we have is a order dated May 11, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes Ramon E. Reyes and others.
No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.
The Story So Far
Magistrate Judge James R. Cho granted the defendants an extension to respond to the complaint, setting a new deadline of July 5, 2024. This order came on May 7, 2024, after the defendants moved for more time to answer or otherwise respond.
All defendants must now file their answers, motions, or other responses by that date. The case remains active under District Judge Ramon E. Reyes Jr., who oversees dispositive motions.
Parties interested in filing such motions must follow Judge Reyes's Individual Rules. The extension suggests the defendants needed additional time to prepare their response, but the court has not yet ruled on any substantive motions. The docket number and court remain unspecified, limiting insight into the case's background or claims.
The next procedural steps will likely involve defendants’ answers or motions to dismiss, which could shape the case’s trajectory.
update What Changed This Week
receipt_long Source expand_more
ORDER granting 13 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. All Defendants shall answer, move or otherwise respond to the complaint by 7/5/2024. Any party wishing to file a dispositive motion should consult District Judge Ramon E. Reyes, Jr.'s Individual Rules. Ordered by Magistrate Judge James R. Cho on 5/7/2024. (SGC)
Juryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.
Case Timeline
1 eventORDER granting 13 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. All Defendants shall answer, move or otherwise respond to the complaint by 7/5/2024. Any party wishing to file a dispositive motion should consult District Judge Ramon E. Reyes, Jr.'s Individual Rules. Ordered by Magistrate Judge James R. Cho on 5/7/2024. (SGC)
Judge Ramon granted Motion for Extension of Time to Answer.
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
0 outlets · 0 articles
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
3 hours, 19 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.