ORDER granting 26 Motion for Extension of Time to May 9, 2025 to Answer for All Defendants. Counsel are to refer to the rules for each Judge to properly determine which Judge non-dispositive motions should be addressed to. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Steven Tiscione on 4/7/2025. (LV)
Case Summary
The court granted defendants an extension to answer the complaint until May 9, 2025. Counsel were reminded to follow judge-specific rules for non-dispositive motions. Magistrate Judge Steven Tiscione signed the order on April 7, 2025.
Latest development
ORDER granting 26 Motion for Extension of Time to May 9, 2025 to Answer for All Defendants. Counsel are to refer to the rules for each Judge to properly determine which Judge non-dispositive motions should be addressed
Order · May 10, 2026
A Motion was filed.
Key Issues
- • Extension to answer
- • Non-dispositive motion procedures
- • Deadline management
Docket Snapshot
Court
Court not identified
Awaiting court metadata
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Court order issued
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
ORDER granting 26 Motion for Extension of Time to May 9, 2025 to Answer for All Defendants. Counsel are to refer to the
Order · May 10, 2026
Coverage
0 articles
0 sources tracked
Participants
1 Presiding Judge
1 linked entity
Judge
Steven Tiscione
What the record shows
The court metadata has not been resolved yet, so Juryvine is keeping the page conservative until a reliable court match lands.
The newest docket activity we have is a order dated May 10, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes Steven Tiscione.
No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.
The Story So Far
Magistrate Judge Steven Tiscione granted a motion extending the deadline for all defendants to file their answers until May 9, 2025. The order, issued on April 7, 2025, directs counsel to consult the specific rules for each judge to determine the proper recipient of non-dispositive motions.
This procedural step clarifies how parties should handle the court's internal processes for handling motions that do not resolve the case's merits. The extension suggests that the defendants requested more time to prepare their responses, possibly due to the case's complexity or ongoing negotiations.
The docket does not provide details on the underlying claims or the parties involved, but the court's order signals active case management at this stage. The case remains open, with no dispositive rulings reported yet. The next significant development will likely involve the defendants' answers or motions addressing the complaint's substance.
update What Changed This Week
receipt_long Source expand_more
ORDER granting 26 Motion for Extension of Time to May 9, 2025 to Answer for All Defendants. Counsel are to refer to the rules for each Judge to properly determine which Judge non-dispositive motions should be addressed to. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Steven Tiscione on 4/7/2025. (LV)
Juryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.
Case Timeline
1 eventORDER granting 26 Motion for Extension of Time to May 9, 2025 to Answer for All Defendants. Counsel are to refer to the rules for each Judge to properly determine which Judge non-dispositive motions should be addressed to. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Steven Tiscione on 4/7/2025. (LV)
A Motion was filed.
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
0 outlets · 0 articles
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
6 hours, 36 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.