Judge Neff grants motion to stay pending Sixth Circuit appeal
Case Summary
Judge Janet T. Neff granted a motion to stay proceedings pending resolution of a defendant's appeal before the Sixth Circuit (No. 14-1680). The court denied requests for a pre-motion conference without prejudice, allowing refiling after the stay lifts or further court order.
Latest development
ORDER denying without prejudice 35 36 requests for pre-motion conference to re-filing once the Stay is lifted, or further order of the Court; granting 42 motion to stay; this matter is STAYED pending resolution of
Order · May 11, 2026
A Motion was filed.
Key Issues
- • Motion to stay
- • Appeal pending
- • Pre-motion conference
Docket Snapshot
Court
Court not identified
Awaiting court metadata
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Court order issued
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
ORDER denying without prejudice 35 36 requests for pre-motion conference to re-filing once the Stay is lifted, or
Order · May 12, 2026
Coverage
0 articles
0 sources tracked
Participants
1 Presiding Judge
1 linked entity
Judge
Janet T. Neff
What the record shows
The court metadata has not been resolved yet, so Juryvine is keeping the page conservative until a reliable court match lands.
The newest docket activity we have is a order dated May 12, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes Janet T. Neff.
No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.
The Story So Far
Judge Janet T. Neff issued an order on October 22, 2014, granting a motion to stay this case pending the resolution of the defendant's appeal before the Sixth Circuit, docket number 14-1680. The court denied without prejudice the plaintiffs' requests for a pre-motion conference, instructing them to refile once the stay is lifted or upon further court order.
This stay effectively pauses all proceedings in the district court until the appellate court decides the pending appeal or the district court orders otherwise. The stay reflects the court's intent to avoid duplicative litigation and conserve judicial resources while the higher court reviews the issues raised by the defendant.
The case remains active but in a holding pattern, awaiting the outcome of the Sixth Circuit appeal. The order does not specify the underlying claims or the grounds for the appeal, focusing instead on procedural posture. The stay means no substantive motions or discovery are expected until the appellate process concludes or the stay is lifted.
This procedural pause is common when an appeal could affect the district court’s jurisdiction or the merits of the case. Judge Neff retains jurisdiction and may revisit the stay if circumstances change. The docket shows recent activity with a motion filed on May 12, 2026, but no indication that the stay has been lifted or modified since 2014.
update What Changed This Week
receipt_long Source expand_more
ORDER denying without prejudice 35 36 requests for pre-motion conference to re-filing once the Stay is lifted, or further order of the Court; granting 42 motion to stay; this matter is STAYED pending resolution of Defendant's appeal in the Sixth Circuit, No. 14-1680, or further order of the Court; signed by Judge Janet T. Neff (Judge Janet T. Neff, clb) (Entered: 10/22/2014)
Juryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.
Case Timeline
1 eventORDER denying without prejudice 35 36 requests for pre-motion conference to re-filing once the Stay is lifted, or further order of the Court; granting 42 motion to stay; this matter is STAYED pending resolution of Defendant's appeal in the Sixth Circuit, No. 14-1680, or further order of the Court; signed by Judge
A Motion was filed.
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
0 outlets · 0 articles
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
4 hours, 42 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.