Judge O'Grady denies motion to vacate and denies extension as moot in civil case
Case Summary
District Judge Liam O'Grady denied a motion to vacate under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 and also denied a motion for a 30-day extension to file a reply brief as moot on August 17, 2022. The civil case 1:21-cv-00849-LO was closed following these rulings.
Latest development
ORDER denying 383 Motion to Vacate (2255); denying as moot 397 Motion for a 30-Day Enlargement of Time to File a Reply Brief as to Arnulfo Fagot-Maximo (6) (see Order for details). Signed by District Judge Liam O'Grady
Order · May 10, 2026
District Judge Liam O'Grady filed a Motion.
Key Issues
- • Motion to vacate denial
- • Extension request denied as moot
- • Case closure
Docket Snapshot
Court
Court not identified
Awaiting court metadata
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Court order issued
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
ORDER denying 383 Motion to Vacate (2255); denying as moot 397 Motion for a 30-Day Enlargement of Time to File a Reply
Order · May 11, 2026
Coverage
0 articles
0 sources tracked
Participants
1 Presiding Judge
1 linked entity
Judge
Liam O'Grady
What the record shows
The court metadata has not been resolved yet, so Juryvine is keeping the page conservative until a reliable court match lands.
The newest docket activity we have is a order dated May 11, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes Liam O'Grady.
No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.
The Story So Far
District Judge Liam O'Grady denied the Motion to Vacate under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 filed by Arnulfo Fagot-Maximo on August 17, 2022. The motion sought to challenge Fagot-Maximo's underlying conviction or sentence.
The court found no grounds to grant relief and dismissed the motion. The judge also denied as moot a related request for a 30-day extension to file a reply brief, since the primary motion was resolved. This ruling closed civil case number 1:21-cv-00849-LO.
The case record shows no further filings or appeals as of that date. The denial ends Fagot-Maximo's current attempt to reopen his federal criminal case through collateral review. The court's order did not provide detailed reasoning in the docket entry, but the swift denial suggests the motion lacked merit or procedural basis.
The case remains closed unless the defendant files a timely appeal or other post-judgment motion. The docket does not indicate any pending motions or stays. Judge O'Grady's ruling follows standard practice in § 2255 proceedings where courts screen motions for substantive claims or procedural defects.
The denial signals that Fagot-Maximo's challenge to his conviction or sentence will not proceed further in this district court. Any further relief would require appellate review or new evidence.
update What Changed This Week
receipt_long Source expand_more
ORDER denying 383 Motion to Vacate (2255); denying as moot 397 Motion for a 30-Day Enlargement of Time to File a Reply Brief as to Arnulfo Fagot-Maximo (6) (see Order for details). Signed by District Judge Liam O'Grady on 8/17/2022. (swil) (c/s to defendant) Civil Case 1:21-cv-00849-LO closed. (Entered: 08/17/2022)
Juryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.
Case Timeline
1 eventORDER denying 383 Motion to Vacate (2255); denying as moot 397 Motion for a 30-Day Enlargement of Time to File a Reply Brief as to Arnulfo Fagot-Maximo (6) (see Order for details). Signed by District Judge Liam O'Grady on 8/17/2022. (swil) (c/s to defendant) Civil Case 1:21-cv-00849-LO closed. (Entered: 08/17/2022)
District Judge Liam O'Grady filed a Motion.
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
0 outlets · 0 articles
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
1 day, 12 hours ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.