ORDER by Judge John F. Walter GRANTING 21 Non-Resident Attorney David C. Pinkhasov's Application to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff, Karina Luzanilla, and designating Andrew J. Gramajo as local counsel. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY (yl) (Entered: 03/27/2026)
Case Summary
Judge John F. Walter granted non-resident attorney David C. Pinkhasov permission to appear pro hac vice for plaintiff Karina Luzanilla. The court also designated Andrew J. Gramajo as local counsel for the plaintiff. This order was entered on March 27, 2026.
Latest development
ORDER by Judge John F. Walter GRANTING 21 Non-Resident Attorney David C. Pinkhasov's Application to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff, Karina Luzanilla, and designating Andrew J. Gramajo as local counsel. THERE
Order · May 15, 2026
Judge John issued an order.
Key Issues
- • Pro hac vice admission
- • Representation of plaintiff
- • Local counsel designation
Docket Snapshot
Court
Court not identified
Awaiting court metadata
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Court order issued
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
ORDER by Judge John F. Walter GRANTING 21 Non-Resident Attorney David C. Pinkhasov's Application to Appear Pro Hac Vice
Order · May 15, 2026
Coverage
0 articles
0 sources tracked
Participants
Parties not parsed yet
0 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
The court metadata has not been resolved yet, so Juryvine is keeping the page conservative until a reliable court match lands.
The newest docket activity we have is a order dated May 15, 2026.
Party extraction has not produced a reliable plaintiff/defendant graph yet, so no speculative names are shown.
No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.
The Story So Far
Judge John F. Walter granted non-resident attorney David C. Pinkhasov permission to appear pro hac vice for plaintiff Karina Luzanilla on March 27, 2026.
The court also appointed Andrew J. Gramajo as local counsel to support Pinkhasov’s participation in the case. This procedural step allows Pinkhasov, who is not admitted to practice in this jurisdiction, to represent Luzanilla in the litigation.
The order does not specify the underlying claims or the court where the case is pending. The docket number and filing date for the complaint remain unknown. The designation of local counsel is standard practice to ensure compliance with local rules and to provide a point of contact within the court’s jurisdiction.
The case remains active, but no further substantive filings or rulings have been recorded publicly. The absence of a PDF document linked to the order suggests limited public disclosure at this stage. The next developments will likely involve motions or pleadings filed by the newly admitted counsel team.
The court has not yet assigned a judge beyond Walter’s procedural involvement with the pro hac vice motion. The case’s subject matter and procedural posture beyond this admission remain unclear.
update What Changed This Week
receipt_long Source expand_more
ORDER by Judge John F. Walter GRANTING 21 Non-Resident Attorney David C. Pinkhasov's Application to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff, Karina Luzanilla, and designating Andrew J. Gramajo as local counsel. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY (yl) (Entered: 03/27/2026)
Juryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.
Case Timeline
1 eventORDER by Judge John F. Walter GRANTING 21 Non-Resident Attorney David C. Pinkhasov's Application to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff, Karina Luzanilla, and designating Andrew J. Gramajo as local counsel. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY (yl) (Entered: 03/27/2026)
Judge John issued an order.
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
0 outlets · 0 articles
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
38 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.