civil-litigation court-watch

Judge Larkins Grants Experian Extension to Answer Complaint Until August 26, 2024

Active Court order issued Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

Magistrate Judge John K. Larkins, III granted Experian Information Solutions, Inc. a 9-day extension to respond to the complaint. The defendant's answer or other response is now due by August 26, 2024.

Latest development

ORDER by docket entry only granting 9 Consent Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Defendant Experian Information Solutions, Inc.'s answer or other response to the complaint will be due no later than 8/26/24. Signed

Order · May 11, 2026

The defendant filed their Answer to the Complaint.

Key Issues

  • Extension of time
  • Defendant response deadline
  • Procedural order
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
fact_check

Docket Snapshot

account_balance

Court

Court not identified

Awaiting court metadata

tag

Docket

Not captured

Civil

timeline

Stage

Court order issued

Active

event

Filed

Date unavailable

Not in the available feed

new_releases

Latest Filing

ORDER by docket entry only granting 9 Consent Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Defendant Experian Information

Order · May 11, 2026

newspaper

Coverage

0 articles

0 sources tracked

groups

Participants

1 Presiding Judge

1 linked entity

gavel

Judge

John K. Larkins

What the record shows

The court metadata has not been resolved yet, so Juryvine is keeping the page conservative until a reliable court match lands.

The newest docket activity we have is a order dated May 11, 2026.

The visible party/entity graph currently includes John K. Larkins.

No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.

chronic

The Story So Far

Updated 1 day, 11 hours ago

The court granted Experian Information Solutions, Inc. an extension to file its answer or other response to the complaint. Magistrate Judge John K.

Larkins, III signed the order on July 3, 2024, setting the new deadline for August 26, 2024. This extension came through a consent motion, indicating agreement between the parties to allow Experian more time to respond. The case remains active, but the docket and court details have not been publicly disclosed.

The extension delays the defendant’s formal response, which is a critical step in the litigation timeline. The answer will clarify Experian’s position on the claims and may include defenses or counterclaims. The next significant event will be Experian’s filing of the answer by the new deadline.

This filing will trigger subsequent procedural steps, including potential motions or discovery requests. The case’s progress hinges on how Experian addresses the complaint in its response.

smart_toy Juryvine case narrative generated from the full docket timeline. How we verify our work.

update What Changed This Week

1 event
gavel
Order 1 day ago
The defendant filed their Answer to the Complaint.
receipt_long Source expand_more

ORDER by docket entry only granting 9 Consent Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Defendant Experian Information Solutions, Inc.'s answer or other response to the complaint will be due no later than 8/26/24. Signed by Magistrate Judge John K. Larkins, III on 7/3/24. (emm)

Juryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

1 event
gavel
Order May 11, 2026

ORDER by docket entry only granting 9 Consent Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Defendant Experian Information Solutions, Inc.'s answer or other response to the complaint will be due no later than 8/26/24. Signed by Magistrate Judge John K. Larkins, III on 7/3/24. (emm)

The defendant filed their Answer to the Complaint.

Advertisement
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

0 outlets · 0 articles

Timeline events

1 record on file

Last updated

1 day, 7 hours ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.