Hunt v. D.C. Metropolitan Police Department
Case Summary
In Hunt v. D.C. Metropolitan Police Department, the court addressed issues related to forfeiture of collateral. The case involves procedural or substantive challenges to collateral forfeiture.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Key Issues
- • Forfeiture of collateral
- • Police department involvement
- • Procedural challenges
Docket Snapshot
Court
D. Mass.
District of Massachusetts · 1st Circuit · MA
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
5:25-po-00923-1 USA vs Hunt
Other · May 09, 2026
Coverage
0 articles
0 sources tracked
Participants
1 Defendant
4 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
This case is tied to District of Massachusetts, a federal district court in MA.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 09, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes D.C. Metropolitan Police Department and others.
No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.
About This Court
District of Massachusetts (D. Mass.) is a federal district court in the 1st Circuit, MA.
Case Timeline
2 events5:25-po-00923-1 USA vs Hunt
The court ordered the forfeiture of collateral in the case of USA vs Hunt, a result of the defendant's failure to comply with court orders. This decision has significant implications for the defendant's ability to participate in the case. The forfeiture of collateral may impact the defendant's ability to post bail or secure a favorable outcome.
1:13-cv-11323 Hunt v. D.C. Metropolitan Police Department
The court appointed counsel for the plaintiff, Hunt, in the case 1:13-cv-11323 against the D.C. Metropolitan Police Department. This appointment is a procedural step to ensure Hunt has adequate representation in the case. The appointment of counsel is a common occurrence in federal lawsuits.
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
0 outlets · 0 articles
Timeline events
2 records on file
Last updated
1 day, 9 hours ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.