civil-litigation discovery court-watch

Judge Neff refers proposed protective order to Magistrate Judge Carmody

Active Court order issued Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

Judge Janet T. Neff referred a proposed stipulated protective order to Magistrate Judge Ellen S. Carmody for review. The order aims to protect confidential information during litigation.

Latest development

NON-DOCUMENT) ORDER REFERRING PROPOSED STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 46 to Magistrate Judge Ellen S. Carmody pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A); signed by Judge Janet T. Neff (Judge Janet T. Neff, rmw

Order · May 11, 2026

Judge Ellen issued an order.

Key Issues

  • Protective order referral
  • Confidentiality
  • Judicial delegation
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
fact_check

Docket Snapshot

account_balance

Court

Court not identified

Awaiting court metadata

tag

Docket

Not captured

Civil

timeline

Stage

Court order issued

Active

event

Filed

Date unavailable

Not in the available feed

new_releases

Latest Filing

NON-DOCUMENT) ORDER REFERRING PROPOSED STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 46 to Magistrate Judge Ellen S. Carmody pursuant to

Order · May 12, 2026

newspaper

Coverage

0 articles

0 sources tracked

groups

Participants

2 Presiding Judges

2 linked entities

gavel

Judge

Ellen S. Carmody

What the record shows

The court metadata has not been resolved yet, so Juryvine is keeping the page conservative until a reliable court match lands.

The newest docket activity we have is a order dated May 12, 2026.

The visible party/entity graph currently includes Ellen S. Carmody, Janet T. Neff.

No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.

chronic

The Story So Far

Updated 19 hours, 5 minutes ago

The court referred a proposed stipulated protective order to Magistrate Judge Ellen S. Carmody for review and handling. Judge Janet T.

Neff signed the referral order under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A), which allows magistrate judges to manage pretrial matters. The referral signals that the parties submitted a protective order agreement to govern confidential information in the case.

The court has not disclosed the underlying dispute, parties, or case details publicly. The referral is a routine procedural step to assign responsibility for resolving disputes over confidentiality and document handling.

Magistrate Judge Carmody will review the proposed order to ensure it complies with legal standards and protects sensitive information appropriately. The case remains active, but no substantive rulings or motions have been reported beyond this referral.

The docket lacks a public filing date or court designation, limiting insight into the broader litigation context. This referral does not indicate any contested issues yet; it simply moves the protective order process to the magistrate judge's docket.

The next developments will likely involve Magistrate Judge Carmody's ruling on the proposed protective order or any objections from the parties. The court's management of protective orders is a common step in federal litigation to safeguard discovery materials and streamline case administration.

smart_toy Juryvine case narrative generated from the full docket timeline. How we verify our work.

update What Changed This Week

1 event
gavel
Order 19 hours ago
Judge Ellen issued an order.
receipt_long Source expand_more

NON-DOCUMENT) ORDER REFERRING PROPOSED STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 46 to Magistrate Judge Ellen S. Carmody pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A); signed by Judge Janet T. Neff (Judge Janet T. Neff, rmw

Juryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

1 event
gavel
Order May 11, 2026

NON-DOCUMENT) ORDER REFERRING PROPOSED STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 46 to Magistrate Judge Ellen S. Carmody pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A); signed by Judge Janet T. Neff (Judge Janet T. Neff, rmw

Judge Ellen issued an order.

Advertisement
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

0 outlets · 0 articles

Timeline events

1 record on file

Last updated

2 hours, 59 minutes ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.