Judge Neff refers proposed protective order to Magistrate Judge Carmody
Case Summary
Judge Janet T. Neff referred a proposed stipulated protective order to Magistrate Judge Ellen S. Carmody for review. The order aims to protect confidential information during litigation.
Latest development
NON-DOCUMENT) ORDER REFERRING PROPOSED STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 46 to Magistrate Judge Ellen S. Carmody pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A); signed by Judge Janet T. Neff (Judge Janet T. Neff, rmw
Order · May 11, 2026
Judge Ellen issued an order.
Key Issues
- • Protective order referral
- • Confidentiality
- • Judicial delegation
Docket Snapshot
Court
Court not identified
Awaiting court metadata
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Court order issued
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
NON-DOCUMENT) ORDER REFERRING PROPOSED STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 46 to Magistrate Judge Ellen S. Carmody pursuant to
Order · May 12, 2026
Coverage
0 articles
0 sources tracked
Participants
2 Presiding Judges
2 linked entities
Judge
Ellen S. Carmody
What the record shows
The court metadata has not been resolved yet, so Juryvine is keeping the page conservative until a reliable court match lands.
The newest docket activity we have is a order dated May 12, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes Ellen S. Carmody, Janet T. Neff.
No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.
The Story So Far
The court referred a proposed stipulated protective order to Magistrate Judge Ellen S. Carmody for review and handling. Judge Janet T.
Neff signed the referral order under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A), which allows magistrate judges to manage pretrial matters. The referral signals that the parties submitted a protective order agreement to govern confidential information in the case.
The court has not disclosed the underlying dispute, parties, or case details publicly. The referral is a routine procedural step to assign responsibility for resolving disputes over confidentiality and document handling.
Magistrate Judge Carmody will review the proposed order to ensure it complies with legal standards and protects sensitive information appropriately. The case remains active, but no substantive rulings or motions have been reported beyond this referral.
The docket lacks a public filing date or court designation, limiting insight into the broader litigation context. This referral does not indicate any contested issues yet; it simply moves the protective order process to the magistrate judge's docket.
The next developments will likely involve Magistrate Judge Carmody's ruling on the proposed protective order or any objections from the parties. The court's management of protective orders is a common step in federal litigation to safeguard discovery materials and streamline case administration.
update What Changed This Week
receipt_long Source expand_more
NON-DOCUMENT) ORDER REFERRING PROPOSED STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 46 to Magistrate Judge Ellen S. Carmody pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A); signed by Judge Janet T. Neff (Judge Janet T. Neff, rmw
Juryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.
Case Timeline
1 eventNON-DOCUMENT) ORDER REFERRING PROPOSED STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 46 to Magistrate Judge Ellen S. Carmody pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A); signed by Judge Janet T. Neff (Judge Janet T. Neff, rmw
Judge Ellen issued an order.
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
0 outlets · 0 articles
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
2 hours, 59 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.