civil-litigation discovery federal-courts court-watch

Thomas v. B. Arnold LLC parties submit proposed protective order in SDNY

25-cv-04938 S.D.N.Y.
Active Court order issued Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

Thomas v. B. Arnold LLC et al (25-cv-04938) involves the submission of a proposed protective order in the Southern District of New York. The protective order aims to govern the handling of confidential information during discovery, reflecting the parties' efforts to manage sensitive data.

Latest development

1:25-cv-04938 Thomas v. B. Arnold LLC et al

Order · May 11, 2026

The court issued an order.

description View filing

Key Issues

  • Protective order
  • Confidentiality
  • Discovery management
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
fact_check

Docket Snapshot

account_balance

Court

S.D.N.Y.

Southern District of New York · 2nd Circuit · NY

tag

Docket

Not captured

Civil

timeline

Stage

Court order issued

Active

event

Filed

Date unavailable

Not in the available feed

new_releases

Latest Filing

1:25-cv-04938 Thomas v. B. Arnold LLC et al

Order · May 11, 2026

newspaper

Coverage

0 articles

0 sources tracked

groups

Participants

1 Defendant

2 linked entities

gavel

Judge

Not assigned in feed

What the record shows

This case is tied to Southern District of New York, a federal district court in NY.

The newest docket activity we have is a order dated May 11, 2026.

The visible party/entity graph currently includes B. Arnold LLC and others.

No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.

chronic

The Story So Far

Updated 13 hours, 42 minutes ago

Thomas v. B. Arnold LLC et al, docket number 25-cv-04938, is an active case in the Southern District of New York.

The case involves a dispute between Thomas and B. Arnold LLC along with other defendants. The court has not yet assigned a judge.

The most recent docket entry is an order issued on May 11, 2026. The parties submitted a proposed protective order, which the court is considering. The protective order aims to govern the handling of confidential information during discovery.

The case remains in the early stages, with no dispositive motions or trial dates set. The protective order's approval will shape how sensitive documents and data are exchanged and used. This procedural step often signals that discovery is about to begin or is underway.

The court's order on May 11 may address the proposed protective order or other preliminary matters. The case’s trajectory will depend on how the court manages discovery and any forthcoming motions. Without a judge assigned, it is unclear who will oversee the case moving forward.

The docket shows no filings indicating substantive rulings or settlement discussions yet. The parties appear focused on setting the parameters for discovery, a critical phase that will determine the scope of evidence available. The case could escalate once discovery progresses or if either side files motions challenging claims or defenses.

smart_toy Juryvine case narrative generated from the full docket timeline. How we verify our work.

update What Changed This Week

1 event
gavel
Order 16 hours ago
The court issued an order.
receipt_long Source (filing) expand_more

Proposed Protective Order ( 41

Open original open_in_new

Juryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.

About This Court

Southern District of New York (S.D.N.Y.) is a federal district court in the 2nd Circuit, NY.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

1 event
gavel
Order May 11, 2026

1:25-cv-04938 Thomas v. B. Arnold LLC et al

The court issued an order.

Advertisement
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

0 outlets · 0 articles

Timeline events

1 record on file

Last updated

1 hour, 36 minutes ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.