MINUTES Further Pretrial Conference held by Judge Alicemarie H. Stotler: Certain changes are made to the proposed pretrial conference order which was lodged on 6/9/03. Matter is continued to 6/18/03 at 2:00pm. Mr Edelman and Mr Schirtzer are directed to attend. CR: William S Stephens (mt) (Entered: 06/20/2003)

The case remains active before Judge Alicemarie H. Stotler, who held a further pretrial conference on June 18, 2003. During the conference, the court made specific changes to the proposed pretrial conference order originally lodged on June 9, 2003.

The matter was continued to allow the parties to address these modifications. Counsel Mr. Edelman and Mr.

Schirtzer were ordered to attend the continued conference. The judge’s minute order, entered on June 20, 2003, reflects these procedural developments but does not disclose substantive rulings or case details. The docket number and court remain unspecified, limiting public insight into the underlying dispute.

The case’s procedural posture centers on finalizing the pretrial conference order, a step that typically sets the framework for trial preparation and scheduling. The involvement of counsel at this stage signals ongoing negotiations or clarifications regarding trial logistics or evidentiary matters.

The absence of further filings or orders since June 2003 leaves the case’s substantive issues and claims unclear. Judge Stotler’s management of the pretrial process suggests the court is focused on ensuring the parties adhere to procedural requirements before moving toward trial or dispositive motions.

The record shows no indication of settlement or dismissal, so the case appears poised to proceed once the pretrial order is finalized. The limited public record shows the importance of the pretrial conference order in shaping the next phase of litigation.