NOTICE OF DISCREPANCY AND ORDER by Judge Alicemarie H. Stotler ordering declaration of Brown; certificate of service; notice of motion and motion; declaration of Edelman submitted by plaintiff Intertainment Licensing received on 12/1/03 is not to be fld but instead rejected; Denial based on: motion date not on Judge's calendar (mt) (Entered: 12/03/2003)
Case Summary
Judge Alicemarie H. Stotler issued a notice of discrepancy and order rejecting several filings by Intertainment Licensing GMBH, including declarations and motions. The rejection was based on the motion date not appearing on the judge's calendar.
Latest development
NOTICE OF DISCREPANCY AND ORDER by Judge Alicemarie H. Stotler ordering declaration of Brown; certificate of service; notice of motion and motion; declaration of Edelman submitted by plaintiff Intertainment Licensing
Order · May 10, 2026
A Motion was filed.
Key Issues
- • Notice of discrepancy
- • Order rejecting filings
- • Procedural compliance
- • Motion scheduling
Docket Snapshot
Court
Court not identified
Awaiting court metadata
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Court order issued
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
NOTICE OF DISCREPANCY AND ORDER by Judge Alicemarie H. Stotler ordering declaration of Brown; certificate of service;
Order · May 10, 2026
Coverage
0 articles
0 sources tracked
Participants
1 Presiding Judge
1 linked entity
Judge
Alicemarie H. Stotler CR
What the record shows
The court metadata has not been resolved yet, so Juryvine is keeping the page conservative until a reliable court match lands.
The newest docket activity we have is a order dated May 10, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes Alicemarie H. Stotler CR.
No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.
The Story So Far
Judge Alicemarie H. Stotler rejected a motion filed by plaintiff Intertainment Licensing on December 1, 2003. The court issued a Notice of Discrepancy and Order directing the plaintiff to submit a declaration from Brown, along with a certificate of service, a notice of motion, and a declaration from Edelman.
The judge refused to file the original motion because the motion date was not on the judge's calendar. This procedural defect led to the outright rejection of the motion rather than a simple delay or rescheduling. The docket does not specify the court or case number, but the matter remains active as of the latest filings.
The plaintiff must correct the procedural errors before the court will consider the motion on its merits. The judge's order shows the importance of adhering strictly to local court calendars and filing protocols. The case has not advanced beyond this procedural hurdle, leaving the substantive issues unresolved.
update What Changed This Week
receipt_long Source expand_more
NOTICE OF DISCREPANCY AND ORDER by Judge Alicemarie H. Stotler ordering declaration of Brown; certificate of service; notice of motion and motion; declaration of Edelman submitted by plaintiff Intertainment Licensing received on 12/1/03 is not to be fld but instead rejected; Denial based on: motion date not on Judge's calendar (mt) (Entered: 12/03/2003)
Juryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.
Case Timeline
1 eventNOTICE OF DISCREPANCY AND ORDER by Judge Alicemarie H. Stotler ordering declaration of Brown; certificate of service; notice of motion and motion; declaration of Edelman submitted by plaintiff Intertainment Licensing received on 12/1/03 is not to be fld but instead rejected; Denial based on: motion date not on Judge's
A Motion was filed.
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
0 outlets · 0 articles
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
10 hours, 35 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.