civil-litigation court-watch

Chief Judge Nunley refers case to magistrate judge for further proceedings

Active Court order issued Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

Chief District Judge Troy L. Nunley referred a case to the assigned magistrate judge for further proceedings on March 25, 2026. The referral follows Local Rule 302 and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), delegating pretrial matters to the magistrate judge.

Latest development

MINUTE ORDER issued by Courtroom Deputy for Chief District Judge Troy L. Nunley on March 25, 2026: This matter is REFERRED to the assigned Magistrate Judge for further proceedings pursuant to Local Rule 302 and 28

Order · May 11, 2026

Judge Troy issued an order.

Key Issues

  • Case referral
  • Magistrate judge
  • Pretrial proceedings
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
fact_check

Docket Snapshot

account_balance

Court

Court not identified

Awaiting court metadata

tag

Docket

Not captured

Civil

timeline

Stage

Court order issued

Active

event

Filed

Date unavailable

Not in the available feed

new_releases

Latest Filing

MINUTE ORDER issued by Courtroom Deputy for Chief District Judge Troy L. Nunley on March 25, 2026: This matter is

Order · May 11, 2026

newspaper

Coverage

0 articles

0 sources tracked

groups

Participants

1 Presiding Judge

1 linked entity

gavel

Judge

Troy L. Nunley

What the record shows

The court metadata has not been resolved yet, so Juryvine is keeping the page conservative until a reliable court match lands.

The newest docket activity we have is a order dated May 11, 2026.

The visible party/entity graph currently includes Troy L. Nunley.

No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.

chronic

The Story So Far

Updated 7 hours, 48 minutes ago

Chief District Judge Troy L. Nunley referred this case to the assigned Magistrate Judge on March 25, 2026. The referral follows Local Rule 302 and 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(B), which allow Magistrate Judges to handle certain pretrial matters. The referral indicates the case is moving into a phase where the Magistrate Judge will oversee further proceedings, likely including discovery disputes, settlement conferences, or preliminary motions.

The docket does not provide details on the underlying claims or parties involved, but the referral signals active case management. The case remains open and pending before the district court, with Judge Nunley maintaining overall jurisdiction. The next significant step will depend on the Magistrate Judge's rulings and scheduling decisions.

On May 11, 2026, Judge Nunley issued an order, but the content of that order is not specified in the docket. The case is in early procedural stages, with the Magistrate Judge expected to guide it toward resolution or trial preparation.

smart_toy Juryvine case narrative generated from the full docket timeline. How we verify our work.

update What Changed This Week

1 event
gavel
Order 8 hours ago
Judge Troy issued an order.
receipt_long Source expand_more

MINUTE ORDER issued by Courtroom Deputy for Chief District Judge Troy L. Nunley on March 25, 2026: This matter is REFERRED to the assigned Magistrate Judge for further proceedings pursuant to Local Rule 302 and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). (TEXT ONLY ENTRY) (Deputy Clerk MDK) (Entered: 03/25/2026)

Juryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

1 event
gavel
Order May 11, 2026

MINUTE ORDER issued by Courtroom Deputy for Chief District Judge Troy L. Nunley on March 25, 2026: This matter is REFERRED to the assigned Magistrate Judge for further proceedings pursuant to Local Rule 302 and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). (TEXT ONLY ENTRY) (Deputy Clerk MDK) (Entered: 03/25/2026)

Judge Troy issued an order.

Advertisement
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

0 outlets · 0 articles

Timeline events

1 record on file

Last updated

29 minutes ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.