CONSENT ORDER REGARDING EXAMINATION PURSUANT TO RULE 35. Signed by Magistrate Judge Douglas E. Miller on 04/08/2019. (tamarm) (Entered: 04/09/2019)
Case Summary
CONSENT ORDER REGARDING EXAMINATION PURSUANT TO RULE 35. Signed by Magistrate Judge Douglas E. Miller on 04/08/2019. (tamarm) (Entered: 04/09/2019)
Latest development
CONSENT ORDER REGARDING EXAMINATION PURSUANT TO RULE 35. Signed by Magistrate Judge Douglas E. Miller on 04/08/2019. (tamarm) (Entered: 04/09/2019)
Order · May 9, 2026
Judge Douglas issued an order.
Docket Snapshot
Court
Court not identified
Awaiting court metadata
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Court order issued
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
CONSENT ORDER REGARDING EXAMINATION PURSUANT TO RULE 35. Signed by Magistrate Judge Douglas E. Miller on 04/08/2019.
Order · May 10, 2026
Coverage
0 articles
0 sources tracked
Participants
1 Presiding Judge
1 linked entity
Judge
Douglas E. Miller
What the record shows
The court metadata has not been resolved yet, so Juryvine is keeping the page conservative until a reliable court match lands.
The newest docket activity we have is a order dated May 10, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes Douglas E. Miller.
No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.
update What Changed This Week
receipt_long Source expand_more
CONSENT ORDER REGARDING EXAMINATION PURSUANT TO RULE 35. Signed by Magistrate Judge Douglas E. Miller on 04/08/2019. (tamarm) (Entered: 04/09/2019)
Juryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.
Case Timeline
1 eventCONSENT ORDER REGARDING EXAMINATION PURSUANT TO RULE 35. Signed by Magistrate Judge Douglas E. Miller on 04/08/2019. (tamarm) (Entered: 04/09/2019)
Judge Douglas issued an order.
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
0 outlets · 0 articles
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
6 hours, 43 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.