Court Grants Consent Motion to Transfer Venue to District of Columbia
Case Summary
The court granted a consent motion to transfer venue to the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. The transfer mooted a scheduled telephonic case management conference and related proceedings.
Latest development
Memorandum of Opinion and Order For the reasons that have been articulated in the memorandum providing the points and authorities on which Defendant relies in support of its Consent Motion to Transfer Venue, ECF No. 6
Order · May 12, 2026
A Motion to Transfer Venue was filed.
Key Issues
- • Consent motion to transfer venue
- • Transfer to District of Columbia
- • Case management implications
Docket Snapshot
Court
Court not identified
Awaiting court metadata
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Court order issued
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
Memorandum of Opinion and Order For the reasons that have been articulated in the memorandum providing the points and
Order · May 12, 2026
Coverage
0 articles
0 sources tracked
Participants
1 Presiding Judge
1 linked entity
Judge
Benita Y. Pearson
What the record shows
The court metadata has not been resolved yet, so Juryvine is keeping the page conservative until a reliable court match lands.
The newest docket activity we have is a order dated May 12, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes Benita Y. Pearson.
No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.
The Story So Far
Judge Benita Y. Pearson granted the defendant's consent motion to transfer venue, moving the case to the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. The order, issued on March 31, 2026, found the defendant's arguments in the motion, filed as ECF No.
6, sufficient to justify the transfer. The case was originally before the Northern District of Ohio but was officially transferred on April 3, 2026.
The transfer cancels the telephonic case management conference scheduled for May 18, 2026, and renders moot the plaintiff's consent motion for an extension of time to file a responsive pleading and to adjourn related deadlines, filed as ECF No. 7.
The court did not provide additional reasoning beyond the points raised in the defendant's memorandum supporting the transfer. The case remains active in the District of Columbia, where all further proceedings will now take place.
update What Changed This Week
receipt_long Source expand_more
Memorandum of Opinion and Order For the reasons that have been articulated in the memorandum providing the points and authorities on which Defendant relies in support of its Consent Motion to Transfer Venue, ECF No. 6 is granted. This cas e is transferred for all further proceedings to the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. The Telephonic Case Management Conference set before the undersigned on 5/18/2026 is cancelled.Additionally, such a transfer makes moot the Board's Co
Juryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.
Case Timeline
1 eventMemorandum of Opinion and Order For the reasons that have been articulated in the memorandum providing the points and authorities on which Defendant relies in support of its Consent Motion to Transfer Venue, ECF No. 6 is granted. This cas e is transferred for all further proceedings to the United States District Court
A Motion to Transfer Venue was filed.
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
0 outlets · 0 articles
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
21 hours, 20 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.