Opposition filed against motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim by Afgan and Nasserifar
Case Summary
Plaintiffs Nader Afgan and Shanar Nasserifar filed a memorandum opposing a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim. The opposition challenges the defendant’s attempt to dispose of the case at an early stage. The filing includes a proposed order for the court’s consideration.
Latest development
Memorandum in Opposition re 10 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Nader Afgan, Shanar Nasserifar. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Mundaca, Francisco) (Entered: 01/30/2026)
Order · May 12, 2026
Nader Afgan filed a Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed.
Key Issues
- • Motion to dismiss opposition
- • Failure to state a claim
- • Early case dismissal
- • Procedural litigation
Docket Snapshot
Court
Court not identified
Awaiting court metadata
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Court order issued
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
Memorandum in Opposition re 10 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Nader Afgan, Shanar Nasserifar.
Order · May 12, 2026
Coverage
0 articles
0 sources tracked
Participants
Parties not parsed yet
0 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
The court metadata has not been resolved yet, so Juryvine is keeping the page conservative until a reliable court match lands.
The newest docket activity we have is a order dated May 12, 2026.
Party extraction has not produced a reliable plaintiff/defendant graph yet, so no speculative names are shown.
No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.
The Story So Far
Nader Afgan and Shanar Nasserifar filed a memorandum opposing a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim on January 30, 2026. The motion to dismiss challenges the sufficiency of the complaint, arguing that the plaintiffs have not alleged facts that would entitle them to relief.
The opposition memorandum aims to show that the complaint meets the legal standard to survive dismissal. The court has not yet assigned a judge to the case, and the docket number remains unknown. The case is active, with no public indication of discovery or other substantive motions filed so far.
The next procedural step will likely involve the court ruling on the motion to dismiss. The outcome will determine whether the case proceeds to discovery or ends at the pleading stage. The parties have submitted a proposed order alongside the opposition memorandum, signaling readiness for the court's decision.
Watch for the court’s ruling on the motion to dismiss, which will shape the litigation’s trajectory. The absence of a judge assignment may delay this ruling, but the docket should update once the court acts.
update What Changed This Week
receipt_long Source expand_more
Memorandum in Opposition re 10 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Nader Afgan, Shanar Nasserifar. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Mundaca, Francisco) (Entered: 01/30/2026)
Juryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.
Case Timeline
1 eventMemorandum in Opposition re 10 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Nader Afgan, Shanar Nasserifar. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Mundaca, Francisco) (Entered: 01/30/2026)
Nader Afgan filed a Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed.
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
0 outlets · 0 articles
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
8 hours, 40 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.