Consent motion to continue filed by Nader Afgan and Shanar Nasserifar
Case Summary
Nader Afgan and Shanar Nasserifar jointly filed a consent motion to continue the case proceedings. The motion includes a proposed order for the court's approval, indicating both parties agree to extend the timeline.
Latest development
Consent MOTION to Continue by Nader Afgan, Shanar Nasserifar. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Mundaca, Francisco) (Entered: 02/26/2026)
Order · May 12, 2026
Nader Afgan filed a Motion to Continue.
Key Issues
- • Consent motion
- • Continuance request
- • Joint agreement
- • Proposed order
Docket Snapshot
Court
Court not identified
Awaiting court metadata
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Court order issued
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
Consent MOTION to Continue by Nader Afgan, Shanar Nasserifar. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Mundaca,
Order · May 12, 2026
Coverage
0 articles
0 sources tracked
Participants
Parties not parsed yet
0 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
The court metadata has not been resolved yet, so Juryvine is keeping the page conservative until a reliable court match lands.
The newest docket activity we have is a order dated May 12, 2026.
Party extraction has not produced a reliable plaintiff/defendant graph yet, so no speculative names are shown.
No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.
The Story So Far
Nader Afgan and Shanar Nasserifar filed a consent motion to continue proceedings on February 26, 2026. The motion included a proposed order, signaling agreement between the parties to delay the case schedule. The court has not yet assigned a judge, and the docket number remains unknown.
The motion aims to pause deadlines or hearings, though the specific reasons for the continuance have not been disclosed in the public filings. This procedural step suggests the parties need more time to prepare or negotiate before the case advances. The case remains active, but without a judge or firm schedule, it is in an early stage of litigation.
The next significant development will likely involve the court’s ruling on the motion to continue, which will set the new timetable for the case. Monitoring the docket for the assignment of a judge and any scheduling orders will provide clarity on how the case will proceed.
update What Changed This Week
receipt_long Source expand_more
Consent MOTION to Continue by Nader Afgan, Shanar Nasserifar. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Mundaca, Francisco) (Entered: 02/26/2026)
Juryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.
Case Timeline
1 eventConsent MOTION to Continue by Nader Afgan, Shanar Nasserifar. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Mundaca, Francisco) (Entered: 02/26/2026)
Nader Afgan filed a Motion to Continue.
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
0 outlets · 0 articles
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
10 hours, 20 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.