2:25-cv-12426 Lindsay Olson v. John Pierce Law P.C. et al
Extending Time to Answer (30 days or less) ( 19
Lindsay Olson v. John Pierce Law P.C. et al is a civil case with docket number 25-cv-12426. The current summary indicates that the defendants have been granted an extension to answer the complaint within 30 days or less. This is a routine request that allows the defendants additional time to respond to the allegations made against them.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Court
C.D. Cal.
Central District of California · 9th Circuit · CA
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
2:25-cv-12426 Lindsay Olson v. John Pierce Law P.C. et al
Other · Apr 28, 2026
Coverage
1 article
1 source tracked
Participants
1 Defendant, 1 Plaintiff
2 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
This case is tied to Central District of California, a federal district court in CA.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated April 28, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes John Pierce Law P.C, 2:25-cv-12426 Lindsay Olson.
Press monitoring has found 1 related article from 1 distinct source.
Lindsay Olson v. John Pierce Law P.C. et al is an active civil matter in Central District of California under docket 25-cv-12426.
The dispute currently identifies 2:25-cv-12426 Lindsay Olson on one side and John Pierce Law P.C on the other. The case is currently organized around extension to answer, 30 days or less.
et al is a civil case with docket number 25-cv-12426. The current summary indicates that the defendants have been granted an extension to answer the complaint within 30 days or less. This is a routine request that allows the defendants additional time to respond to the allegations made against them.
On April 28, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The court granted John Pierce Law P.C. and other defendants 30 days or less to respond to Lindsay Olson's complaint. This extension gives the defendants more time to prepare their answer.
The court's decision allows the case to proceed without immediate.
The next thing to watch is whether the latest other produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.
Central District of California (C.D. Cal.) is a federal district court in the 9th Circuit, CA.
The court granted John Pierce Law P.C. and other defendants 30 days or less to respond to Lindsay Olson's complaint. This extension gives the defendants more time to prepare their answer. The court's decision allows the case to proceed without immediate pressure on the defendants to respond.
Extending Time to Answer (30 days or less) ( 19
Sources tracked
1 outlet · 1 article
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
8 hours, 4 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.