2:25-cv-09618 Los Angeles Waterkeeper v. Jimco, Inc.
Extending Time to Answer (More than 30 days) ( 14
Los Angeles Waterkeeper has requested an extension of time to answer in a civil case. The court has not yet ruled on the motion. This is not an unusual request, as parties often need more time to gather information or respond to complex issues. The extension of time to answer is a common procedure in civil cases, allowing parties to avoid default judgments or other adverse consequences.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Court
C.D. Cal.
Central District of California · 9th Circuit · CA
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
2:25-cv-09618 Los Angeles Waterkeeper v. Jimco, Inc.
Other · Apr 28, 2026
Coverage
1 article
1 source tracked
Participants
1 Plaintiff
2 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
This case is tied to Central District of California, a federal district court in CA.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated April 28, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes 2:25-cv-09618 Los Angeles Waterkeeper and others.
Press monitoring has found 1 related article from 1 distinct source.
Los Angeles Waterkeeper Seeks Extension of Time to Answer in Civil Case is an active civil matter in Central District of California under docket 25-cv-09618.
The main identified plaintiff or petitioner is 2:25-cv-09618 Los Angeles Waterkeeper. The case is currently organized around extension of time to answer, Los Angeles Waterkeeper.
Los Angeles Waterkeeper has requested an extension of time to answer in a civil case. The court has not yet ruled on the motion. This is not an unusual request, as parties often need more time to gather information or respond to complex issues.
The extension of time to answer is a common procedure in civil cases, allowing parties to avoid default judgments or other adverse consequences.
On April 28, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The court granted Jimco, Inc. an extension to file its answer in the Los Angeles Waterkeeper v. Jimco, Inc.
case, allowing it more than 30 days to respond. This extension gives Jimco additional time to prepare its defense. The case, 2:25-cv-09618, is ongoing.
The next thing to watch is whether the latest other produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.
Central District of California (C.D. Cal.) is a federal district court in the 9th Circuit, CA.
The court granted Jimco, Inc. an extension to file its answer in the Los Angeles Waterkeeper v. Jimco, Inc. case, allowing it more than 30 days to respond. This extension gives Jimco additional time to prepare its defense. The case, 2:25-cv-09618, is ongoing.
Extending Time to Answer (More than 30 days) ( 14
Sources tracked
1 outlet · 1 article
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
17 hours, 14 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.