civil-litigation federal-courts court-watch

Los Angeles Waterkeeper Seeks Extension of Time to Answer in Civil Case

25-cv-09618 C.D. Cal.
Active Active litigation Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

Los Angeles Waterkeeper has requested an extension of time to answer in a civil case. The court has not yet ruled on the motion. This is not an unusual request, as parties often need more time to gather information or respond to complex issues. The extension of time to answer is a common procedure in civil cases, allowing parties to avoid default judgments or other adverse consequences.

No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.

Key Issues

  • extension of time to answer
  • Los Angeles Waterkeeper
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
fact_check

Docket Snapshot

account_balance

Court

C.D. Cal.

Central District of California · 9th Circuit · CA

tag

Docket

Not captured

Civil

timeline

Stage

Active litigation

Active

event

Filed

Date unavailable

Not in the available feed

new_releases

Latest Filing

2:25-cv-09618 Los Angeles Waterkeeper v. Jimco, Inc.

Other · Apr 28, 2026

newspaper

Coverage

1 article

1 source tracked

groups

Participants

1 Plaintiff

2 linked entities

gavel

Judge

Not assigned in feed

What the record shows

This case is tied to Central District of California, a federal district court in CA.

The newest docket activity we have is a other dated April 28, 2026.

The visible party/entity graph currently includes 2:25-cv-09618 Los Angeles Waterkeeper and others.

Press monitoring has found 1 related article from 1 distinct source.

chronic

The Story So Far

Updated 17 hours, 14 minutes ago

Los Angeles Waterkeeper Seeks Extension of Time to Answer in Civil Case is an active civil matter in Central District of California under docket 25-cv-09618.

The main identified plaintiff or petitioner is 2:25-cv-09618 Los Angeles Waterkeeper. The case is currently organized around extension of time to answer, Los Angeles Waterkeeper.

Los Angeles Waterkeeper has requested an extension of time to answer in a civil case. The court has not yet ruled on the motion. This is not an unusual request, as parties often need more time to gather information or respond to complex issues.

The extension of time to answer is a common procedure in civil cases, allowing parties to avoid default judgments or other adverse consequences.

On April 28, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The court granted Jimco, Inc. an extension to file its answer in the Los Angeles Waterkeeper v. Jimco, Inc.

case, allowing it more than 30 days to respond. This extension gives Jimco additional time to prepare its defense. The case, 2:25-cv-09618, is ongoing.

The next thing to watch is whether the latest other produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.

smart_toy Juryvine case narrative generated from the full docket timeline. How we verify our work.

About This Court

Central District of California (C.D. Cal.) is a federal district court in the 9th Circuit, CA.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

1 event
info
Other April 27, 2026

2:25-cv-09618 Los Angeles Waterkeeper v. Jimco, Inc.

The court granted Jimco, Inc. an extension to file its answer in the Los Angeles Waterkeeper v. Jimco, Inc. case, allowing it more than 30 days to respond. This extension gives Jimco additional time to prepare its defense. The case, 2:25-cv-09618, is ongoing.

Advertisement
newspaper

Press Coverage

1 article
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

1 outlet · 1 article

Timeline events

1 record on file

Last updated

17 hours, 14 minutes ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.