newspaper
2:26-cv-02820 Clifton Walker v. Anthony Coleman et., al.
Extending Time to Answer (30 days or less) ( 11
Apr 28, 2026
1 min read
civil-litigation
federal-courts
court-watch
Clifton Walker v. Anthony Coleman et al: Time to Answer Extended
26-cv-02820
C.D. Cal.
Advertisement
description
Case Summary
Clifton Walker sued Anthony Coleman and others. The court has granted an extension for the defendants to answer the complaint. This is a procedural step that delays the formal response to the lawsuit.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Key Issues
- • Extension of time to answer
- • Service of process
smart_toy
Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records.
How we verify our work.
fact_check
Docket Snapshot
account_balance
Court
C.D. Cal.
Central District of California · 9th Circuit · CA
tag
Docket
Not captured
Civil
timeline
Stage
Active litigation
Active
event
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
new_releases
Latest Filing
2:26-cv-02820 Clifton Walker v. Anthony Coleman et., al.
Other · Apr 28, 2026
newspaper
Coverage
1 article
1 source tracked
groups
Participants
1 Defendant, 1 Plaintiff
2 linked entities
gavel
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
This case is tied to Central District of California, a federal district court in CA.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated April 28, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes Anthony Coleman et., al, 2:26-cv-02820 Clifton Walker.
Press monitoring has found 1 related article from 1 distinct source.
chronic
Updated 16 hours, 19 minutes ago
The Story So Far
Clifton Walker v. Anthony Coleman et al: Time to Answer Extended is an active civil matter in Central District of California under docket 26-cv-02820.
The dispute currently identifies 2:26-cv-02820 Clifton Walker on one side and Anthony Coleman et., al on the other. The case is currently organized around Clifton Walker, Anthony Coleman et al.
The available docket gives enough signal to track the case, but not enough to overstate the merits. This page will become more useful as filings, orders, hearings, and party appearances add detail.
On April 28, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The court granted Anthony Coleman and other defendants an extension to respond to Clifton Walker's lawsuit, giving them 30 days or less to file their answer. This means the defendants now have more time to prepare their defense. The extension was granted as a.
The next thing to watch is whether the latest other produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.
smart_toy
Juryvine case narrative generated from the full docket timeline.
How we verify our work.
About This Court
Central District of California (C.D. Cal.) is a federal district court in the 9th Circuit, CA.
Advertisement
Case Timeline
1 event
info
Other
April 28, 2026
2:26-cv-02820 Clifton Walker v. Anthony Coleman et., al.
The court granted Anthony Coleman and other defendants an extension to respond to Clifton Walker's lawsuit, giving them 30 days or less to file their answer. This means the defendants now have more time to prepare their defense. The extension was granted as a standard procedure.
Advertisement
newspaper
1 article
Press Coverage
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
1 outlet · 1 article
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
3 hours, 34 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.